Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Prasad GLN

    Prasad GLN

    Pro User


    • Likes

      9

    • Content Count

      31,897


  2. Sunil Ahya

    Sunil Ahya

    Moderators


    • Likes

      3

    • Content Count

      7,360


  3. Dr V S Prasanna Rajan

    Dr V S Prasanna Rajan

    Pro User


    • Likes

      2

    • Content Count

      627


  4. sanjay ranjan

    sanjay ranjan

    Members


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      1


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 03/12/2021 in all areas

  1. Enclosed herewith this post an attached file containing the instructions given by the Department of Posts not to insist the identity of complainant while dispatching the complaint by speed / registered post. Department of Posts - Non Disclosure of the Identity of complainant under PIDPI.pdf
    2 likes
  2. GROUNDS OF FIRST APPEAL: 1. The PIO has declined information against point no. XX of the RTI application by merely quoting the exemption to information under section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005 without giving meaningful justification for arriving at that reason for denial. This is against letter and spirit of RTI Act. Please find the following persuasive precedents wherein the concerned authorities have ruled that merely quoting the bare clause of the Act does not imply that the reasons have been given: DECISIONS OF THE CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC) IN THIS REGARD:
    2 likes
  3. Ground of First Appeal: 1. With respect to the information requested vide point no. 1 of the RTI Application and the PIO's denial with respect to the same, the Appellant humbly submits as under: The FAA's attention is drawn towards the definition of information as given under section 2(f) of the RTI Act, which is as follows (underline emphasis added): Quote: (f) "information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material
    1 like
  4. Thank this FORUM and all those experts that enriched the forum with their contribution which is helping many distressed students. Please recollect the initial doubts you have expressed and how you have transformed into a guide yourself. Congratulations, and we want all members to become experts in the same manner taking your example. "sir thank you so much. i am feeling good now. letter should be post to my college or HRD/UGC/AICTE. and sir please tell me. if i compaint against college the college chairman is MLA so he must be have many connection, so i am little afraid of them.
    1 like
  5. I am in receipt of a PM from @YASH 6688 as follows: sir i got my orginal documents from the college which college were demanding 4 years fees . i complaint in UGC online and offline within a week i got call from college to get my certificate back. i didnt pay single rupee to college sir if anyone had same problem like me tell them to complaint in UGC greivance online and offline Thank you so much sir
    1 like
  6. how did i got my orginal certificate documents from private college college demanding 4 years fees and how i didnt pay single rupee and got my certificate 1. open UGC-Grievance Redressal Portal website create account login by clicking login with mouse dont use enter key. click on 2. New Grievance 3. then select state then your university name will come ( if your college if affilate to any university then select that university name not your college name because affilate college will force your college to get your certificate.) 4. then nature of grievance s
    1 like
  7. File RTI Application to NODAL OFFICER, District Collector, Villupuram with Rs.10/- adhesive court fee and get the information from them. You can construct your query basing on following suggestion. Information solicited. 1.Please provide information on "Paimash number to survey number co- relation certificate" and the laid down procedure, authority that can issue such certificate for Gingee, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. 2.Please provide certified copy of such laid down procedure.
    1 like
  8. Sir, I have raised a single query as per your advice.Did not solicit information such as checks conducted, cases booked etc., Break Inspector called me and stated that PIO could not understand the query i.e 1. Please provide terms and conditions that a transport vehicle (Passenger/goods transport) should maintain as per the sanction of route permits. such as seating capacity, cargo, first aid box fitness certificate etc, He asked me to clarify on the exact information Iam looking for. No hearing conducted by IC. Only telephonic conversation with SIC Clerk. He called me an
    1 like
  9. IBA is just an Association of member banks, and a spokes person. Their role is limited as spokesperson of the banks, and IBA is not empowered to exercise any control and at the most issue guidelines as circulars and can not issue directives. I have not come across single instance wherein IBA's involvement was mentioned in recruitment policy of Indian Banks either PSU or Private Banks. Many private members are not even members of IBA. WIth regard to releasing of some benefits as per SC judgments in implementation date of BPS, weighted average for VRS, private banks never followed those SC j
    1 like
  10. Karnataka Bank being a private entity, you can not get such information under RTI Act. RTI Act is only for getting information from public authorities. A citizen can not demand any information from private entity.
    1 like
  11. Inform to FAA immediately posting such evidence and seek another date for hearing with advance intimation of one week for making arrangements and schedule. Do not take everything so seriously, and avail opportunity of first appeal hearing and try to get information during first appeal itself. Second appeal hearing takes time, and decision is uncertain, and information with such delay may not serve any purpose. A sensible FAA can not reject your request and even if he takes a decision, it must be on facts of grounds stated in First Appeal. When First appeal hearing is not mandatory, this m
    1 like
  12. You can file RTI Application to State Public Information Officer, of the concerned Tehasildar Office. Write on Regd. Post Envelope The Tehasildar,.................and in the envelope keep Application under RTI in specified format seeking such certified copy of such order providing details of such Revenue Court. The RTI Act has taken care of such needs of citizens. You can affix adhesive court fee stamp of Rs.10/- on application. Search website of Tehasildar office or Collectorate website for more details of filing application and prescribed fees. Whoever receives must endorse t
    1 like
  13. YES. Ack not necessary and mandated. If PIO fails to respond then once again you can enclose copies of RTI Application, delivery status in India post, and transfer intimation with first appeal. (The endorsement to another PIO is more than an acknowledgment)
    1 like
  14. Respected sir/madam, where can i requirement a copy of the MOD LETTER NO. 25098/XIII/AG/PS5(B)964/S/D(AG-II) AND NO 25098/XIII/AG/PS5(B)961/S/D(AG-II) BOTH DATED 15 JUN 1964 AND LETTER NO 25098/XIII/AG/PS5(B)/1805/D(AG-II) DATED 25 TH APR 1967 PLS SIR SEND EMAIL ADDRESS. VERY VERY THANKS SIR - - - Updated - - - Respected sir/madam, where can i requirement a copy of the MOD LETTER NO. 25098/XIII/AG/PS5(B)964/S/D(AG-II) AND NO 25098/XIII/AG/PS5(B)961/S/D(AG-II) BOTH DATED 15 JUN 1964 AND LETTER NO 25098/XI
    1 like
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30
  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Most Contributions

    1. karira
      karira
      43915
    2. Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      31897
    3. RAVEENA_O
      RAVEENA_O
      18992
    4. ambrish.p
      ambrish.p
      16009
    5. jps50
      jps50
      15720
  • Most Solved

    Nothing has been solved this week.

  • Our picks

    • सड़क निर्माण में भ्रष्टाचार ना हो और पारदर्शिता के लिए आप चाहे तो निर्माण स्थल से #RTI के तहत निर्माण कार्य का सैंपल लेकर लैब में टेस्टिंग के लिए दे सकते है। http://rtiindia.org

       

      : https://righttoinformation.wiki/guide/applicant/application/sample/road-work
      • 0

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • Instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof
      Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha held that seeking citizenship proof in case of demand of sensitive information is justified but seeking a signed copy of the application does not seem appropriate as the online portal does not mandate uploading of signatures.
       
      Sinha was hearing the plea of an Odisha-based RTI applicant who had sought from the Army information regarding implementation of rules under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in all defence establishments.
      The Army did not provide any information to the applicant, the CIC noted. Akhand approached the Commission with a complaint that the central public information officer (CPIO) of the Army has demanded a signed copy of his online RTI application as well as identity proof before providing him the records.
      “In this regard, it may be noted that as far as CPIO’s request for citizenship proof is concerned, the same is not questioned as Commission in its prior decision(s) has held the view that Armed Forces stand on a slightly different footing as there may be instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, and for such reasons it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof,” Sinha noted.
      Originally posted here!
       
      • 0 replies
    • Some of you -- at least CJ Karira, who helped me years ago in one crucial step, getting SEBI to acknowledge its own circular! -- know of a 15-year quest among desi academics to get SEBI to release its stale masked FII data for academic research. At one point years ago a parliamentary query by Shyam Benegal, then Rajya Sabha MP, sought the release of this data for academic research. He then made a subsequent RTI query asking what had done about his complaint about the terrible answer he got to his parliamentary question. We thought we had succeeded when in response to that SEBI did put in public domain that FII data and promised to update. And to  their credit, they did update it from time to time, even if a bit fitfully. But thanks to a question by a curious IIT-Madras undergrad, we realized that what SEBI gave with one hand they took away with another. While the idea was that the FII IDs would be masked to preserve privacy, without telling anyone, SEBI changed the masks each month, drastically reducing the value for academic research (since you can't even tell how many distinct FIIs are there in the data base, and whether anyone traded over time). It also caused mistakes in academic research since no one imagined that SEBI would use changing masks, when no other regulator or exchange on the planet does so.

      To get SEBI to finally agree to not hide by changing masks, but to keep a stable mask, has taken many years. But at least per the ruling received yesterday, it has been achieved, with no violence to anyone. I attach the ruling. I can also post the various submissions made at the Second Appeal hearing if there is any interest (need to scrub email-IDs, per the policy of this site).

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdfThis RTI site, in particular Karira-ji, has been very helpful to me in the course of this long episode thru countless RTI queries. And I am grateful for that from the bottom of my heart. I am confident we will see quite a few PhD dissertations using this database within the next few years.

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdf
      Second_Addendum_w_Appendices_29th_Feb_2020.pdf
      CIC-SEBIH-A-2017-139953-BJ.pdf
      Third_Addendum to Additional Submission for RTI Second Appeal_2nd_March_2020.pdf
      To_CIC_2nd_appeal_27th_February_2020_Redacted.pdf
      Draft_Talking_Points_for_the_Hearing.pdf
      From_SEBI_Written Submiissions - Murugappa Krishnan 139953.pdf
      thanking_CIC_post_decision_Redacted.pdf
      • 3 replies
    • There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny - they should be setting the example of transparency.
      • 2

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • LUCKNOW: The Central government has provided categorized security cover to 308 persons, out of which 24 have been provided the highest Z-plus cover, according to the answer to an RTI query.


      As per information provided by S.C.L. Das, Joint Secretary in the Union Home Ministry to city-based activist Nutan Thakur, two dozen persons have been given Z-plus security, 59 persons have been given Z security, 109 have been given Y-plus, 34 have been given Y and 82 persons have been given X category security.

       
      • 2

        Reputation Points

      • 1 reply
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Dr V S Prasanna Rajan
      Dr V S Prasanna Rajan
      2
    2. 2
      sanjay ranjan
      sanjay ranjan
      1
    3. 3
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      1
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,694
    • Total Posts
      427,902
  • Blog Statistics

    • Total Blogs
      2,809
    • Total Entries
      2,924
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      489,538
    • Most Online
      12,211

    Suraj kate
    Newest Member
    Suraj kate
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy