Jump to content
News Ticker
  • NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
  • shows RTI
  • RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
  • 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
  • The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
  • Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
  • Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 12/01/2019 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    Enclose the screen print and write on the hard copy the information that is not available while submitting to FAA A small piece of advice, if you are capable of finding an ultimate remedy or can bring a change with the information, you can follow up the matter. Otherwise, all these efforts are simple waste and eat away your precious time.
  2. 1 point
    Pay the fees and get copies for Query No.1: For the rest of the queries, down load the contents with such date of download and go for First Appeal stating that SPIO has provided incorrect, incomplete and misleading information.
  3. 1 point
    You may download Maharashtra RTI Forms from the following link: https://rtiindia.org/blogs/entry/2113-rti-application-first-appeal-second-appeal-forms-for-maharashtra/ You will need to paste a court fee stamp of Rs. 10/- on the RTI application. One can get a court fee stamp from any of the nearby courts.
  4. 1 point
    File simple RTI Application and seek information from Nodal SPIO of a District. Information solicited: 1.Please provide me certified copy of directives/orders/notifications for proper utilization of funds received from MNREGS SBA 2.Please provide cases of abuse/diversification/syphoning of these funds to malafide purposes by authorities and action taken against such gross misuse of public funds to be spent for welfare since Mar.2019 to Sept,19 3.Please provide the certified copies of orders that state periodicity and check mecanism or Social audit or other types of audits 4.Please provide the Name, designation and mobile No. of implementing authority in District level and the formalities to be observed for seeking such past audit reports.
  5. 1 point
    First ask your father to reduce the grievance in writing to Estate Officer, PWD and wait for their response in writing. In the meanwhile search website of the PWD Maharashtra, RTI segment and collect prescribed format of Application for RTI and mode of Remitting fee. If your father's grievance fails to get any response, please submit single point query to the SPIO, PWD of relevant office. Information solicited: 1)Please provide information on Grievance letter dt...................from. Sri.....................with designation...............of........................(dept) occupying the quarters at............................located at..................................on repairs to building (Water seepage) 2.Please provide the work order for latest repairs to the building, inspection report and whether entire amount was settled to the contractor without his negligence in performing the repairs.
  6. 1 point
    RTI DRAFT HELP NEEDED 1. please provide me certified copies of naukari patrak of Lalpur police station, dated:- 18/11/18, time:- 10 am to 6 pm, as per mudda no:-5 outward no - 465/2019. 2. Please provide me certified copies of movement register of Lalpur police station, dated:- 18/11/18, with outgoing and incoming time between 10 am to 6 pm. 3. Please provide certified copies of record from which information given under the RTI Act by Lalpur police station, in point no - 4, mudda no - 6, outward no - 943/19, dated:- 02/05/2019 derived 4. Please provide me certified copies of the record from which Information given under the RTI Act by Lalpur police station, in point no :-1 and 2, outward no - 1590/19, dated:-05/08/20019 derived 5. Please provide the total no of policemen, deployed by Lalpur police at near Umiyadham Apartment for backfilling Incomplete work of under ground drainage on dated:- 18/11/18 between 4 pm to 6 pm as per record of Lalpur police station. Also provide certified copies of that records. 6. Please provide me certified copies of record that indicate, place and purpose of official duty discharge by PSI Lalpur and badge no :- 234,276,336,755 on dated:- 18/11/18, time:- 4 pm to 6 pm. In accordance with the provision of section - 2(j)(1) of the RTI Act, please provide me the opportunity of Inspection of records of Police Station Lalpur, please note that during the aforesaid Inspection, I shall select required Information from your official record, please allow me for taking photography of particular documents as per the CIC judgement regarding appeal no - CIC/WB/A/2006/00144. Kindly do provide me certified copies of such selected Information on payment of prescribed fees. Sent from my Redmi 4 using RTI INDIA mobile app
  7. 1 point
    OTS accepted by bank for Rs.50000/= in 2003 but prooceds deposited in 2004 without closing the account. The applicant asked for “No dues Certificate”. It was refused. The Bank took the possession of Car under SARFAESI Act-2002 & sold it. The customer was not informed the facts. He considered that the car was stolen & filed claim with Insurance co. The Co. Finalized claim & deposited it to A/C holder’s account. Again the fact was not informed. A civil Suit was filed on wrong affidavit concealing the facts. It was also informed to court that documents demanded by A/C holder were destroyed as per policy. On this affidavit the case was dismissed. The applicant asked information/ documents of the account including account statement in 2012 which was provided in July 2019 at the stage of IInd appeal with CIC. The destruction of record & other facts pleaded by Bank were taken seriously by CIC & a show cause notice was issued alongwith penalty of Rs. 25000/= was imposed. The CPIO was advised to provide all the information within 10 days. Thus violation of provision was proved by inordinate delay & concealing information. The A/C holder/ Applicant received OTS without further payment. RTI IS A POWERFUL WEAPON.
  8. 1 point
    You will need to file a first appeal u/s. 19(1) with the concerned First Appellate Authority. Grounds for First Appeal: 1. The PIO has denied information on the ground that the information sought is sub-judice. With respect to the PIO's above ground, the Appellant submits as under: That, as per section a PIO is required to either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9. The PIO has neither provided the requested information nor denied it for any of the reasons specified in section 8 and 9. Nevertheless, in this regard, your Hon'ble Authority attention is kindly drawn towards the fact that: A particular information is sub-judice is not an exemption under any of the provisions of section 8 and 9 of the RTI Act. Thus, the PIO has disposed of my request for information in violation of section 7(1) read with section 8 and 9 of the RTI Act. 2. The support for the Appellant's above submission can be found in the following decisions of the Central Information Commission and High Court judgments: Please find the relevant excerpts reproduced below: Dear Humhonge: Please visit the blog on the following link for filling the details in the second point mentioned above: http://jps50.blogspot.com/2012/11/
  9. 1 point
    This comes in APPELLATE STAGE and not in ORIGIONAL STAGE
  10. 1 point
    Public information officer has to either provide the information or deny information stating such clause under Sec. 8 sub section 1 as exemption with such justification. Please go through Sec.8 (1) and the denial stating " disproportionately diversion of the resource of public authority" was no where stated in such sub section as exempted information. There were many CIC decisions that stated that this stipulation is not an exemption under RTI. Unless member posts the exact query, precise answer as to whether it covers under Sec.2 (f) can not be given. In General a PIO must provide that information which is available in material form in his custody if it is not exempted specifically under Sec. 8 (1) Go for First appeal to FAA Grounds for first Appeal: a) As per Sec.7 (1) PIO can only "reject the request for any of the reasons specified in Sec.8 & Sec. 9" b)2.There is no such exemption in Sec.8 (1) that states that PIO can reject the request on the ground that providing of information disproportionately diversion of the resource of public authority" c)It was upheld in umpteen second appeals by CIC that information can not be rejected with the reason "disproportionately diversion of the resource of public authority c)PIO has also not provided for any justification for applying such assumed reason for exempting information and quoting some reason in way relevant to deny information legally and not offering any justification for such denial was treated as "deliberate and malafide denial" Hence this first appeal.
  11. 1 point
    Good Evening Team, Pardon the verbosity below. This may be useful for some members in a similar situation. thank you. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The question is about conflicting provisions in the circulars issued by PCDA/ RBI/ and Apex court rulings. All pertaining to recovery of over-payments. Requesting help- to whom / which public authority should I address these queries? Frank/ unbiased opinion as to whether it will be effective? Humbly request you to please go through the attached documents please. In case of recovery due to the over payment of Pensions by the bank, the following circulars are relevant. 1) RBI Circular RBI/2015-16/340 DGBA.GAD.No.2960 /45.01.001/2015-16 dated March 17, 2016 Point C- Recovery can be made at the rate of 1/3rd the net pension amount 2) DPPI Circular: Point 103.2: For recovery where the over payment has been made for more than a year, bank must refer the case to PCDA- which will take the approval of competent sanctioning authority. Only then the bank can proceed with the recovery. 3) Circular 141 dated 7.12.2019 similar to RBI Circular above regarding recovery at the rate of one - third of nett pensions 4) OM for letter of Undertaking: issued by GOI, DOPPW- dated 7th May, 2014 This is regarding the letter of undertaking which every pensioner gives to the bank prior to the pension commencement. 5) S. No. Case / Circular reference Main Points 1 Defence Pensioners Payment Instructions - 2013 Pension recovery due to excess paid cannot be done if detected beyond 1 year of making erroneous payment without the sanction of the competent authority. Ref. Para: 101 & 103.2 2 State of Punjab and others Vs. Rafiq Masih reported in 2015 (4) SCC 334 (Apex Court Judgement) Recoveries by the Employers would be impermissible in law when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of five years, before the order of recovery is issued 3 ShyamBabu Verma Vs. Union of India reported in 1994 SC (2) 521 (Apex Court Judgement) Three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that no steps should be taken to recover or adjust any excess amount paid to the employees due to the fault of the respondents 4 Syed Abdul Qadir and others Vs. State of Bihar and others reported in (2009) 3 SCC 475 Three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that the relief against recovery is granted by courts not because of any right in the employees, but in equity, exercising judicial discretion to relieve the employees from the hardship that will be caused if recovery is ordered Case: Regarding Illegal Recovery of over payment of Pensions by PNB. --The Pensioner retired from Defense. The PSA (Pension Sanctioning Authority) is PCDA (Pensions) Allahabad. --The PDA (Pension disbursal authority) is PNB. --PNB is illegally deducting the Pension without the approval of the competent sanctioning authority. This over payment continued for more than 10 years. --PCDA (Pensions) is meanwhile looking the other way and is citing circulars in support of its action. The provisions in this circular(s) are in opposition to the instructions in DPPI - Defence Pension Payment Instructions(2013) which is issued by PCDA (Pensions) - Allahabad This DPPI is a guide book to be followed by all the banks in matter of pension disbursal. Queries 1) In light of the several supreme court judgments which states that no recovery can be done beyond 5 years of over payments, does this circular ( OM for letter of Undertaking: issued by GOI, DOPPW- dated 7th May, 2014 ) loose its validity / become null and void? Does this OM give unfettered right to the banks to start recovery from the Pensioner citing the letter of undertaking? 2) Circular 141 issued by PCDA(Pensions) dated 7.12.2019 and RBI Circular dated March 17, 2016 - both green flag the recovery of over payment at 1/3rd the nett of pensions. Whereas DPPI states that no recovery can be done if the error of over payment has been continuing beyond 1 year- without the approval of competent sanction authority. In the particular case, PCDA (P) is citing circular 141 in its support to allow the bank the recovery. Is the action of PCDA valid/ legally tenable? To whom should these queries be addressed to? Thank you. Andy OM for Letter of Undertaking.pdf DPPI_pages_1,2,3,82,83_84-_only.pdf RBI Circular 17th March 2016.PDF Circular-141.pdf
  12. 1 point
    The art of seeking information under RTI is construction of the application. You can ask the list of proposals submitted to Principal secretary, and status of such proposals from DRD SPIO .
  13. 1 point
    Only the applicant can bring that to the attention of IC during second appeal hearing. It depends on IC, and mostly it is just mention to avoid it in future. The inconvenience maximum to the applicant is 5 days if it is misused. If it is purposefully transferred knowing that the other authority is not concerned then it amounts to deliberate and malafide action.
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30

Announcements

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy