Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Prasad GLN

    Prasad GLN

    Pro User


    • Likes

      7

    • Content Count

      31,495


  2. sudha devi

    sudha devi

    Regular Members


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      31


  3. Agrawal Naveen

    Agrawal Naveen

    Members


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      16


  4. Sunil Ahya

    Sunil Ahya

    Moderators


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      7,293


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 07/29/2020 in all areas

  1. This is sudha.( Ex.deputy registrar of uttrar pradesh nurses and midwives council.)Every one knew what injustice faced by me. [https://sudhadevibenjamin] Dr. Rajesh Jain sent fake document of appointment order through RTI ( after first appeal) which was not issued during my Extension period. Now i have applied for second appeal.He need to show office *copy which *was received /signed by me *during hearing at RTI bhawan to prove that it was issued during my extension period. How I prove my grievances through rti...pls help me With regards* Sudha Devi Sent from my L
    1 like
  2. Seek such information direct from his office under RTI. Subject on Information sought: Dr. Jain mentioned in CM igrs report dated 30.8.2016 that he closed deputy registrar post on 1.1.2015. Mr. Mukesh meshram mentioned in CM igrs report dated 09.01.2019 that sudha stopped coming to office without any information from 1.1.2015. But her tenure was supposed to be closed on 31.1.2015. The post was closed on 1-1-2015 Priority and urgent as there was fraudulent misrepresentation to Chief Minister. Information solicited: 1.Please provide such certified copy
    1 like
  3. RTI is not suitable to your problem. The collecting banker has the responsibility of presenting the cheque as immediately as possible to the paying banker and credit the proceeds after receiving such amounts. In case of local cheques the credit has to be given within 48 working hours and in case of outstation within maximum 7 days. If there is a delay of 15 days there is deficiency of service and you are a consumer. So file a complaint to bank in which you have presented the cheque on line immediately informing facts. EX: This is to bring to your kind attention that I have
    1 like
  4. Remember, RTI is not a complaint or grievance redressal way. An Indian citizen can as a right can seek information from public authorities if that information is available in material form as public record and not exempted under RTI Act. In your case you can file RTI Application and seek laid down norms/orders/guidelines and free to use that document for remedy through HC (Writ mandamus) To my knowledge transport is treated as Public Utility and essential service and lockdown rules may not apply to certain employees performing such duties for COVID19. Application dt.
    1 like
  5. RTI is not panacea or final remedy for your issue. As you have won the case, in case of non implementation of orders contact your advocate for filing Contempt proceedings. (Most of the facts stated by you appears to be absurd though that may be true. "(Appointment letter no 85911-This document is valid for two years from 1 year 2012 to 31 December 2013. And I was not issued any other appointment letter for the third year. But Dr. Rajesh Jain suddenly said that this appointment The letter is valid for three years and also the order to transfer me from the council on 31 / December / 2014.
    1 like
  6. The first question is as to whether the Lottery is having such permissions/approvals/sanctions etc. Now that they have identified public authority, as the process has already started, wait for their response. Depending on their response you can go for first appeal if possible. It is still doubtful whether endowments/temples are Public authority or not. You ought to have asked whether the temple is having such permissions to conduct such lotteries and entire set of documents submitted by them temple authorities while seeking permission if any for conducting such lottery and
    1 like
  7. I have filed a Second Appeal before TNSIC since the FAA gave a weird reply of his own
    1 like
  8. You are welcome as members can get immense benefit out of your services, as you are a faculty in reputed institution teaching on RTI. Unfortunately experts like Mr.CJ Karira, Ms Raveena Oberoi are not visiting the site for more than a year and left a legacy to the forum. Be assured that many experts pay regular visits (Including law makers/ICs) to the Forum and your posts may catch their attention. You can also write blogs if the contents are large in volume.
    1 like
  9. Also you may apply under the provisions of the Indian Registration Act and the Rules made thereunder which would be much faster. But you need to have all details of the document particularly the registration number.
    1 like
  10. I strongly condemn this attack. Such attacks have occurred in the past as well, and there is no way to ensure that it won't happen again with someone else. I feel its time India thinks on the following lines. 1. Create separate ministry of RTI in Central & all State Govts. 2. Ministry to be managed by a group of Public Body, not by any one Elected Representative. 3. Create a Spl Dept of RTI in office of every Public Authority. 4. This Dept be kept beyond Jurisdiction of concerned Public Authority 2 avoid bias. 5. Atta
    1 like
  11. You can briefly narrate all your efforts and post the same in success story, so that other members can get inspiration from your efforts and perseverance.
    1 like
  12. Information under RTI cannot be Refused even if the matter is sub judice : Naveen Agrawal Workshop on RTI organised for officers of primary schools 320 people trained in 4 days Nagpur. "Information sought under the RTI act 2005 cannot be denied on the pretext of the matter concerned being sub judice as per the provision of the act under section 8 (1) (b)" observed Mr. Naveen Maheshkumar Agrawal, recognised trainer of YASHADA , Pune and Registrar, Dada Ramchand Bakhru Sindhu Mahavidyalaya. However, he further added that the Section 8(1) (b) of the RTI Act exempts from di
    1 like
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30
  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Most Contributions

    1. karira
      karira
      43915
    2. Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      31495
    3. RAVEENA_O
      RAVEENA_O
      18992
    4. ambrish.p
      ambrish.p
      16009
    5. jps50
      jps50
      15720
  • Most Solved

    1. 1
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      2
    2. 2
      Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      1
  • Our picks

    • WHAT AFTER DECISION BY CENTRAL/STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

      There are a large number of instances, where the State Information Commissioners are passing orders contrary to the spirit and object of RTI Act and contradicting the laid down procedures. Another issue is the Public Authorities did not comply the decisions of CIC/SIC and the Information Commissions are not strict about enforcing penal provisions under section-20. The Information Seekers feel they were pushed to the dead end. There is a common feeling that no appeal lies against the decision of State Information Commissioner. Let us examine it.
      • 1

        Reputation Points

      • 1 reply
    • Instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof
      Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha held that seeking citizenship proof in case of demand of sensitive information is justified but seeking a signed copy of the application does not seem appropriate as the online portal does not mandate uploading of signatures.
       
      Sinha was hearing the plea of an Odisha-based RTI applicant who had sought from the Army information regarding implementation of rules under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in all defence establishments.
      The Army did not provide any information to the applicant, the CIC noted. Akhand approached the Commission with a complaint that the central public information officer (CPIO) of the Army has demanded a signed copy of his online RTI application as well as identity proof before providing him the records.
      “In this regard, it may be noted that as far as CPIO’s request for citizenship proof is concerned, the same is not questioned as Commission in its prior decision(s) has held the view that Armed Forces stand on a slightly different footing as there may be instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, and for such reasons it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof,” Sinha noted.
      Originally posted here!
       
      • 1

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • Some of you -- at least CJ Karira, who helped me years ago in one crucial step, getting SEBI to acknowledge its own circular! -- know of a 15-year quest among desi academics to get SEBI to release its stale masked FII data for academic research. At one point years ago a parliamentary query by Shyam Benegal, then Rajya Sabha MP, sought the release of this data for academic research. He then made a subsequent RTI query asking what had done about his complaint about the terrible answer he got to his parliamentary question. We thought we had succeeded when in response to that SEBI did put in public domain that FII data and promised to update. And to  their credit, they did update it from time to time, even if a bit fitfully. But thanks to a question by a curious IIT-Madras undergrad, we realized that what SEBI gave with one hand they took away with another. While the idea was that the FII IDs would be masked to preserve privacy, without telling anyone, SEBI changed the masks each month, drastically reducing the value for academic research (since you can't even tell how many distinct FIIs are there in the data base, and whether anyone traded over time). It also caused mistakes in academic research since no one imagined that SEBI would use changing masks, when no other regulator or exchange on the planet does so.

      To get SEBI to finally agree to not hide by changing masks, but to keep a stable mask, has taken many years. But at least per the ruling received yesterday, it has been achieved, with no violence to anyone. I attach the ruling. I can also post the various submissions made at the Second Appeal hearing if there is any interest (need to scrub email-IDs, per the policy of this site).

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdfThis RTI site, in particular Karira-ji, has been very helpful to me in the course of this long episode thru countless RTI queries. And I am grateful for that from the bottom of my heart. I am confident we will see quite a few PhD dissertations using this database within the next few years.

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdf
      Second_Addendum_w_Appendices_29th_Feb_2020.pdf
      CIC-SEBIH-A-2017-139953-BJ.pdf
      Third_Addendum to Additional Submission for RTI Second Appeal_2nd_March_2020.pdf
      To_CIC_2nd_appeal_27th_February_2020_Redacted.pdf
      Draft_Talking_Points_for_the_Hearing.pdf
      From_SEBI_Written Submiissions - Murugappa Krishnan 139953.pdf
      thanking_CIC_post_decision_Redacted.pdf
      • 4

        Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
    • There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny - they should be setting the example of transparency.
      • 2

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • LUCKNOW: The Central government has provided categorized security cover to 308 persons, out of which 24 have been provided the highest Z-plus cover, according to the answer to an RTI query.


      As per information provided by S.C.L. Das, Joint Secretary in the Union Home Ministry to city-based activist Nutan Thakur, two dozen persons have been given Z-plus security, 59 persons have been given Z security, 109 have been given Y-plus, 34 have been given Y and 82 persons have been given X category security.

       
      • 2

        Reputation Points

      • 1 reply
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      6
    2. 2
      Ravi Ahuja
      Ravi Ahuja
      1
    3. 3
      Agrawal Naveen
      Agrawal Naveen
      1
    4. 4
      sudha devi
      sudha devi
      1
    5. 5
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      1
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,407
    • Total Posts
      427,025
  • Blog Statistics

    • Total Blogs
      2,803
    • Total Entries
      2,923
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • Devi Devi
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      489,008
    • Most Online
      12,211

    Kandi Aravind Reddy
    Newest Member
    Kandi Aravind Reddy
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy