Jump to content

Leaderboard

  1. Prasad GLN

    Prasad GLN

    Pro User


    • Likes

      5

    • Content Count

      31,509


  2. Madathil

    Madathil

    Members


    • Likes

      2

    • Content Count

      3


  3. Sunil Ahya

    Sunil Ahya

    Moderators


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      7,294


  4. humhongeykamyaab

    humhongeykamyaab

    Members


    • Likes

      1

    • Content Count

      16


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 08/06/2020 in all areas

  1. Dear Sunilji & Prasadji Thank you so much. I have filed RTI as per your suggestion. After that they started behaving well. I have already got my last month salary. They have replied by saying they processed my OM also. But have not yet received and therefore I filed an appeal. But I have to say. "The Power of RTI is great". They admitted I have no liability in RTI. They admitted they do not need No outstanding Liability certificate from me. Thank you so much. Rethi
    2 likes
  2. Kindly file a first appeal on the ground that, in accordance with the provision of section 2(f) of the RTI Act, 2005 the PIO ought to have accessed the information from a private body and provided the same to the RTI Applicant. Draft your first appeal by referring to the decision of the Delhi High Court in Telecom Regulatory Authority Of ... vs Kabir Shankar Bose. The said Delhi HC decision is attached herewith this post. TRAI_..._vs_Kabir_Shankar_Bose_on_20_November,_2018.PDF
    1 like
  3. The grounds for appeal duly numbered as i to vi and prayer was incorporated in the earlier reply. In CP Act, there are two important issues involved. 1.You have to pay some kind of fee, consideration for availing a service/purchase a product. and must have promised or paid that consideration to opposite party. 2.The opposite party after receiving such consideration must have failed to perform his part of obligation that amounts to either negligence or deficiency of service and thus the complainant was deprived of the service assured by OP. 3.Then one has to approach to Dist
    1 like
  4. Reddy garu, This forum is not connected to any Govt, and it is a voluntary forum with members like you and me, and offer guidance depending on our experience and knowledge. This is your problem, and as a citizen with such awareness you should bring such SOCIAL EVILS to the knowledge of govt. At the same time, consider the risk involved to you and your family and always do collective work and build up an influential circle that can fight for you, when you are dragged into a problem. RTI Act empowers a citizen in seeking information from public authorities as a right and unfo
    1 like
  5. Remember, RTI is not a complaint or grievance redressal way. An Indian citizen can as a right can seek information from public authorities if that information is available in material form as public record and not exempted under RTI Act. In your case you can file RTI Application and seek laid down norms/orders/guidelines and free to use that document for remedy through HC (Writ mandamus) To my knowledge transport is treated as Public Utility and essential service and lockdown rules may not apply to certain employees performing such duties for COVID19. Application dt.
    1 like
  6. You can never get Patta through RTI. RTI is a process that gives valid rights to citizens in seeking information from public authorities, which is available in the form of a material record and not exempted from disclosure. Pattas are given on some eligibility criterion. If Authorities rejected for giving patta to you, then you can seek information for the reasons for rejecting the patta and such office notes from the sanctioning authority.
    1 like
  7. Do not be more concerned about the time frame during the present COVID19 uncertainity. Think yourself fortunate if you get the information. You may continue First appeal process after waiting for 35 days from receipt of your application by SPIO. You have informed that your application was received on 25th July, and agitated on 28th July,2020. Please wait upto 31st Aug,2020 and file first appeal on deemed denial of information, if you fail to get information from SPIO.
    1 like
  8. Hi all, It would be good to hear some success stories from the members here regarding their experience with lokpal in dealing with issues..I believe lokpal entertains only issues related to corruption. Is this true? Just checked the Twitter update from former CIC Sailesh Gandhi. If true, this is disturbing. Regards. Andy.
    1 like
This leaderboard is set to Kolkata/GMT+05:30
  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Most Contributions

    1. karira
      karira
      43915
    2. Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      31509
    3. RAVEENA_O
      RAVEENA_O
      18992
    4. ambrish.p
      ambrish.p
      16009
    5. jps50
      jps50
      15720
  • Most Solved

    1. 1
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      1
  • Our picks

    • सड़क निर्माण में भ्रष्टाचार ना हो और पारदर्शिता के लिए आप चाहे तो निर्माण स्थल से #RTI के तहत निर्माण कार्य का सैंपल लेकर लैब में टेस्टिंग के लिए दे सकते है। http://rtiindia.org

       

      : https://righttoinformation.wiki/guide/applicant/application/sample/road-work
      • 0

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • WHAT AFTER DECISION BY CENTRAL/STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

      There are a large number of instances, where the State Information Commissioners are passing orders contrary to the spirit and object of RTI Act and contradicting the laid down procedures. Another issue is the Public Authorities did not comply the decisions of CIC/SIC and the Information Commissions are not strict about enforcing penal provisions under section-20. The Information Seekers feel they were pushed to the dead end. There is a common feeling that no appeal lies against the decision of State Information Commissioner. Let us examine it.
      • 1

        Reputation Points

      • 1 reply
    • Instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof
      Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha held that seeking citizenship proof in case of demand of sensitive information is justified but seeking a signed copy of the application does not seem appropriate as the online portal does not mandate uploading of signatures.
       
      Sinha was hearing the plea of an Odisha-based RTI applicant who had sought from the Army information regarding implementation of rules under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in all defence establishments.
      The Army did not provide any information to the applicant, the CIC noted. Akhand approached the Commission with a complaint that the central public information officer (CPIO) of the Army has demanded a signed copy of his online RTI application as well as identity proof before providing him the records.
      “In this regard, it may be noted that as far as CPIO’s request for citizenship proof is concerned, the same is not questioned as Commission in its prior decision(s) has held the view that Armed Forces stand on a slightly different footing as there may be instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, and for such reasons it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof,” Sinha noted.
      Originally posted here!
       
      • 1

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • Some of you -- at least CJ Karira, who helped me years ago in one crucial step, getting SEBI to acknowledge its own circular! -- know of a 15-year quest among desi academics to get SEBI to release its stale masked FII data for academic research. At one point years ago a parliamentary query by Shyam Benegal, then Rajya Sabha MP, sought the release of this data for academic research. He then made a subsequent RTI query asking what had done about his complaint about the terrible answer he got to his parliamentary question. We thought we had succeeded when in response to that SEBI did put in public domain that FII data and promised to update. And to  their credit, they did update it from time to time, even if a bit fitfully. But thanks to a question by a curious IIT-Madras undergrad, we realized that what SEBI gave with one hand they took away with another. While the idea was that the FII IDs would be masked to preserve privacy, without telling anyone, SEBI changed the masks each month, drastically reducing the value for academic research (since you can't even tell how many distinct FIIs are there in the data base, and whether anyone traded over time). It also caused mistakes in academic research since no one imagined that SEBI would use changing masks, when no other regulator or exchange on the planet does so.

      To get SEBI to finally agree to not hide by changing masks, but to keep a stable mask, has taken many years. But at least per the ruling received yesterday, it has been achieved, with no violence to anyone. I attach the ruling. I can also post the various submissions made at the Second Appeal hearing if there is any interest (need to scrub email-IDs, per the policy of this site).

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdfThis RTI site, in particular Karira-ji, has been very helpful to me in the course of this long episode thru countless RTI queries. And I am grateful for that from the bottom of my heart. I am confident we will see quite a few PhD dissertations using this database within the next few years.

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdf
      Second_Addendum_w_Appendices_29th_Feb_2020.pdf
      CIC-SEBIH-A-2017-139953-BJ.pdf
      Third_Addendum to Additional Submission for RTI Second Appeal_2nd_March_2020.pdf
      To_CIC_2nd_appeal_27th_February_2020_Redacted.pdf
      Draft_Talking_Points_for_the_Hearing.pdf
      From_SEBI_Written Submiissions - Murugappa Krishnan 139953.pdf
      thanking_CIC_post_decision_Redacted.pdf
      • 4

        Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
    • There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny - they should be setting the example of transparency.
      • 2

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Madathil
      Madathil
      2
    2. 2
      humhongeykamyaab
      humhongeykamyaab
      1
    3. 3
      Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      1
    4. 4
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      1
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,417
    • Total Posts
      426,959
  • Blog Statistics

    • Total Blogs
      2,804
    • Total Entries
      2,923
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • garg0505
    • Padmanabhan2
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      489,024
    • Most Online
      12,211

    Newest Member

    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy