Jump to content

RTI VIdeos

Visit our New RTI Videos. Click here!

3.65 crore per day ad spending by Government -RTI

According to information obtained under RTI by Desai, the central government has spent Rs 632.18 crore on print media, Rs 475.11 crore on electronic media and Rs 208.54 crore on outdoor media. The information on how much money spent on the advertisement on foreign media is not available with the Bureau of Outreach and Communication.

"It is shocking to see that central government spent almost Rs 1315.83 crore. Which means the government spends Rs 3.65 crore per day. That's a huge amount but they have given just Rs 600 crore to Kerala state which is in distress due to floods," said Desai.

Prime Minsiter’s ‘fitness challenge’ video costs Zero Rupees in making

‘No expenditure has been incurred on (the) filming of the video posted by Shri Narendra Modi. The video was filmed at the Prime Minister’s Residence. The videography was done by the PMO cameraman. Nothing has been procured for the video,’ the PMO said.

The 'Fitness Challenge' was started by Rathore on Twitter as part of the 'Hum Fit Toh India Fit' campaign on May 22.While taking up star cricketer Virat Kohli's 'Fitness Challenge', the Prime Minister on June 13 shared a video of him performing yoga on Twitter.
Later, some reports said that Rs 35 lakh were spent on making the video.

Comprehensive Sexuality Education soon!

Replying to an RTI query, ministry’s central public information officer (CPIO) Anand Prakash, also the deputy secretary, informed that he had directed the department of school education to take necessary action on the issues related to MHRD urgently, as directed by Madras HC. He also sent a copy of his reply to Dr Indrajit Khandekar, professor and in-charge of Clinical Forensic Medicine Unit (CFMU) at Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (MGIMS), Sevagram. 
In the order, justice N Kirubalan had directed the central government to take a decision to introduce free and compulsory comprehensive sexuality education at the high school level. It should be done to enable students to understand gender identity, sexuality, age-related physical changes and problems, and to protect themselves from sexual advances and abuses. “India has its commitment under United Nations International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Agenda 1994, affirming the sexual and reproductive rights (SRRs) of adolescents and young people as per Article 253 of the Constitution of India,” the judge had said. 

Illegal Schools mushrooming in Thane- RTI

Thane is a hotbed of illegal schools, the number of which continues to increase every year, reveals an RTI (Right to Information) query. The RTI response revealed that year 2018-19 saw the number of illegal schools rise to 62. Of these 62, the maximum increase was seen in English medium schools — 49 schools compared to last year's 38.
The RTI response revealed that year 2018-19 saw the number of illegal schools rise to 62. The number of illegal schools for the financial year 2017-18 was 55, as reported by DNA in April this year. And in 2016-17, there were 39 such schools in Thane.
Of these 62, the maximum increase was seen in English medium schools — 49 schools compared to last year's 38. The number of illegal Hindi medium schools have grown to 10 from last year's eight. On the other hand, the number of illegal Marathi medium schools have declined from seven to three.
Most of these illegal schools are in Mumbra, Kalwa and Diva. There are over 271 civic, government, aided, unaided and private recognised schools in Thane. And 184 are unaided but recognised private schools in Thane.
When contacted Manish Joshi, deputy commissioner- education, TMC confirmed that such schools mushroom in Mumbra, Diva. "People want schools at their doorstep, and are least bothered to know whether it is legal or illegal," says Joshi. 
  • momita

    Another threat to RTI. Now from the Data Privacy panel

      The Justice Srikrishna panel on data protection has called for amending the Right to Information Act to restrict non-disclosure of information only in cases where harm to an individual outweighs the common good of transparency and accountability in the fu

    In its 213-page report (external link) that calls for a new legislation to protect an individual's right over his data, the committee said neither the right to privacy nor the right to information is absolute and the two will have to be balanced against each other in some circumstances.

    The panel said data protection law is designed to limit the processing of personal data to legitimate reasons and adds there is a conflict between transparency and privacy. 


    The panel said a lot of information sought from a public authority may contain personal data of some kind or another.

    "Further a strict interpretation of purpose limitation may give rise to the inference that any disclosure other than for the purpose for which the personal data was submitted would lead to an unwarranted invasion of privacy," it said.

    "To avoid this predicament, the RTI Act must specifically spell out the circumstances in which disclosure of such personal information would be a proportionate restriction on privacy having regard to the object of the RTI Act in promoting transparency and accountability in public administration.

    "This must be done keeping in mind the fact that the RTI Act generally leans in favour of disclosure of information," it said. 

    "Therefore, in addition to the likelihood of harm, disclosure should be restricted only where any likely harm outweighs the common good of transparency and accountability in the functioning of public authorities," the report said.

    It proposed that the RTI Act be amended to state that 'nothing contained in the data protection bill will apply to the disclosure' so as to 'prevent privacy from becoming a stonewalling tactic to hinder transparency'. The Committee said that such a formulation offers a more precise balancing test in reconciling the two rights and upholding the spirit of the RTI Act without compromising the intent of the data protection bill.

    • Thanks 1

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Prasad GLN


    17.The commissioEvery one speaks of constitutional rights, though as an official he is not aware as how to treat a citizen appearing before them as Appellant.  The attitude is like a Primary school head master controlling his pupils.

    Most of the PIOs that receive less than 15 RTI applications per annum , are quoting the following decisions for denying information under RTI, if  certified copy basing on which information was provided.  Whether it is  proper or not can be decided only during second appeal decisions after two years.  But appellants should live to wait for such CIC decisions.

    16. Any citizen has right to information only once and not repeatedly.

    16.Repeated RTI Applications amounts to clogging the office of public authority and CPIO  would be right in refusing the same with intimation.

    17.The commission believes that it can record the fact of abuse of RTI Act 2005 and notify the admonition, direct / recommend applicants not to resort to abuse any more and directly recommend public authorities to refuse them.   If any applicant resorts to three such repeated applications, the commission may even recommend blocking of such abuse and direct the public authority not to entertain the same applicant any more, which has again to be notified.


    The proverb 'devil quoting the scriptures is right when those who do not care for common men speak of the constitution and it's rights.  Every stakeholder is contributing for killing RTI..  Read through such decisions of those who cry 'foul', you do not find any sanctity in their decisions or respect to RTI Act or equity.   Publicity, publicity and you can get only when you raise your voice against ruling government.  What about other Information Commissioners in the entire country,  can not they speak or having courage?


    • Sad 1

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    This is true in the circumstances you discuss is very vital and really barring few I/C have gutts to implement the RTI act in true spirit which was crafted keeping in view transparency in Government working but neither executive nor political class remains to be accountable.😷

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Prasad GLN


    Let us be honest.  An  applicant is more worried about his single case.  ICs crave for publicity decisions.  There is nothing one can do if PIO do not want to provide any information, one has to wait for minimum of two years for getting a decision.   It is not always possible to endlessly wait for two years for decision.  After observing all this, Hon. Karira who was very vocal and  most active participant, promoted this forum now became more pessimistic and stated that everything is ready and only cremation is due.  When no one can made parties bring within definition of Public Authority, when those personal information on public servant on corruption matters became a matter between employer and employee, what can you make.   The inititial enthusiasm and spirit died long back.  Just we can only express sorry for the state of affairs.  There are still who still wish to get publicity, and there are still who is having hope that they can revive the old spirit.  But, I am a pessimistic man, and believe that no party is really interested in RTI any more when they are in power.

    Let iu not blame one party alone.  Unless the  penalties are made mandatory and FAA is made accountable, you bring hundred changes, it can never work.  Do not think that those who are successful in bringing out have done on their own, they have support from insiders and encouragement from rulers and they have their own influence.  Without any of the three a common's success is one percent.  Even when both CIC/HC/SC stated as to when and how denials are to be made with justification, still you find the same PIOs denying information, knowing that they are denials are not proper, even after appellant clarifies with such authentic clarification.

    The show must  go on..  Read atleast one decision, and you can find that in rare cases only appellant is successful and those who are successful are fortunate. 

    It is another issue, as to how that information was put to logical end.

    • Thanks 1

    Share this comment

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Topics




Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy