- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'days'.
Found 8 results
Sajib Nandi posted a topic in RTI in MediaIn a reply to Manoranjan Roy, Central Railway said a charge of Rs 1,000 per page plus service tax would be levied on the activist for the information on reservation between February 11-15 that he had asked for; the same information could have been provided on a CD for just Rs 60 Read more at: Want reservation details? Pay Rs 2.4 cr, railways tell Mumbai RTI activist - News
akhilesh yadav posted a topic in RTI in MediaIn Uttar Pradesh, where a school student was arrested recently for posting alleged “objectionable” comments on Facebook against SP leader and minister Azam Khan, Section 66A has been invoked in at least 399 cases in the last two years. These 399 cases are from 46 of the state’s 75 districts, according to information obtained by The Indian Express under the RTI Act. The remaining districts are still to respond. Read at: Almost one case every two days: How everybody loves 66A in Uttar Pradesh | The Indian Express
akhilesh yadav posted a topic in RTI in MediaNew Delhi: Asking the Delhi Lieutenant Governor's office to desist from adopting a flip-flop approach, the CIC has directed it to make clear within 30 days whether it considers itself a public authority under the Right to Information Act or not. Read at: Are you a public body under RTI or not? CIC wants Delhi L-G's reply in 30 days - Firstpost
akhilesh yadav posted a topic in RTI in MediaHyderabad: The opaque manner in which officials are functioning appears to kill the very spirit of empowering people. Here is an instance where an official took nearly a month to reply to an RTI applicant. The reply reflects the prevailing “babu culture” in government administration. Instead of providing the information, the officer concerned directed the applicant to seek it from another source. What beats all is why the officer took 30 days to “provide this information”. M Srinivas, a CPI (M) worker, sought information on the extent of assigned lands in Telangana State. Read at: RTI Applicant Redirected After 30 Days of Filing Form - The Hans India
Hello sir I need help. I have applied for first appeal. Within how many days hearing should be done? If the hearing results on my favor, with in how many days PIO should give the information from the hearing date? Thanks.
I had a Chevrolet Aveo UV-A car registered in Koramangala, Bangalore in Aug 2008, which was transferred to Aluva, Kerala and re-registered there in July 2012. Since then I have been pursuing the road tax refund from RTO, Koramangala. It took more than a year to organise all the required documents by RTO, Koramangla to process the refund. Finally in Jan 2014 I got an acknowledgement admitting my claim and was asked to report after two weeks. Since then I have been periodically visiting the office only to be given another date and excuse. Finally when I thought it was almost through, the officer processing it informed me that the process note indicates the requirement of the original tax paid receipt. When I had stated that it is endorsed in the RC book, they said that will not do. On meeting one of the Joint RTOs I was advised to remit a fee and collect a certificate from the concerned section that such an amount was paid on that day. This procedure took another 10 days which the clerk concerned reluctantly did, grumbling about its necessity. When I had gone to enquire about it he told me that he had a helluva time finding the old register where it was recorded. Though the certificate was ready I had to get it signed by an officer called the HQ Assistant, who at that time was not in his seat. When he had come I was given this huge register and a another book to be carried to his room, who then questioned me again on the requirement of such a certificate in a manner that sounded like I had committed a serious mistake of not preserving the original tax paid receipt. Finally the certificate was signed and I carried it happily to the section officer handling the refund only to be told that I will have to come another day. I went there again after 10 days. This time the excuse was that it will take another 10 days for process. Since my patience was wearing out I used the contacts of a friend to talk to an officer in the Office. He was kind enough to come over from another department and personally go through my file. On going through it he told be that it has been audited and the amount will be released within a week. I promptly went there after a week, but the officer concerned just glanced at me and disappeared. Again I had contacted my friend, who on enquiry with the contact at the RTO informed me that the request is pending with the Treasury and that I will be informed over phone when it will be ready. It is now nearing 6 months after the claim was admitted. Kindly let me know what procedure I should follow to air my grievance and get it redressed at the earliest.
krsna.kumar posted a question in Ask for RTI SupportDear Activists, I have filed an online complaint against PIO and FA and signed copy already dispatch 45 days ago but status is updated on website is signed copy awaited. Moreover i have sent an email but haven't received any reply so far. please confirm what should be my next step. Information is directly related to my Life and Liberty. Thanks in advance. Krsna
drgipatel posted a question in Ask for RTI SupportHello All To the Municipal Corporation (Parks and Gardens) I had written the application under the RTI Act dated 27/03/2008, and recieved the reply dated 25/04/2008. I had filed for my 1st Appeal dated 23/05/2008 which is within 30 days from reciept of the Reply. Yesterday on 27/06/2008 I recieved a letter from the department that they had recieved my Appel Letter on 28/05/2008 and my appeal letter shall not be considered. as it has not reached them on time. my question is as i have replied within 30 days of reciept of their reply am i responsible for postal delays. my case has been going on for nearly since 1 year now with this department and every time they play some type of trick to avoid giving me information i have still 1 case pending with the state commision. Regards