- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'high court case'.
Found 5 results
Friends, Happy to inform I had filed a case (shared in this forum than) against illogical decision of SIC, Raj in 2012. Ultimately yesterday final hearing was done and case was decided in my favour with cost on PIO (Chief Engineer PHED) to be recovered from his salary. Brief Summary of my case RTI application made to Chief Engineer PHED with IPO. PIO returned my application with IPO saying that apply to another PIO..... Filed complaint to SIC Raj u/s 18 for refusal to accept and/or transfer of my RTI u/s 6(3).... SIC directed me while disposing my complaint, to approach PIO again with in 7 days and also observed that there was no error done by me while submitting my RTI request. Ground taken by me in court: 1. SIC cannot order other than penalty on my complaint (cited Manipur case) 2. Cited 2 similar cases of same SIC, where in application with fee was returned by PIO to applicant and SIC had noted in his decision that there is no provision in RTI act to return the fee/application, hence PIO was directed to provide information (hence discrimination with me). 3. Cited Namit sharma case, which bounds SIC and similar tribunals to abide by laws of precedence set by High courts and SC. All the points well accepted by learned justice of Raj HC. Soon I will upload copy of judgment as soon as I get it from court. Last but not least, I must thank this forum and many stalwarts of this forum who motivated me by their learnings, experiences and their quest for fight for justice.
Guest posted a question in Ask for RTI SupportI want to know that is supreme court order is only for showing answer sheets to students, is there any thing if a student is not satisfying with the evaluation of examiner, I filed a case in high court jaipur to see my answer sheets of b.tech under rajasthan technical university(RTU) kota. after two visits by me and a notice by my lawyer of filing contempt for not obeying order given by high court to show me answer sheets within 2 months. RtU called me and shown answer sheets which correctly indicates that answer sheets are not correctly checked, solutions of 8 marks are simply cut, and given 1 or 2 marks out of 8 in some solutions which are the same in my textbook. there is a difference in marks given inside and outside of sheet in 2 questions. in some questions marks are over marked by 0. simply given 0 out of 8 and 16 in some questions. rtu officials said that we can't object on marking by examiner and supreme court order is also only for showing copies to students, no body can go against marking by examiner. please tell me whether i filed another case in high court for revaluation of sheets is there any provision for it? These peoples are making fun of my hard work of 1 year.
I had downloaded a judgment from either the Delhi High Court or the Madras high Court ruling that a transfer of a RTI application under section 6(3) is valid only between one public authority to another and not internally. Does anyone have the copy of the judgment? or where can I find it? Thank you.
Freinds... I need help... Having heard about RTI, I thought if I can use this too. I have a peculiar situation here. A court case is supposed to be listed. Now ordinarily the case should be listed every week, however every week, the listing date is postponed for another week. Now my question is how RTI can be helpful for me to get this case listed. And I did some inital searches and found that high courts does provide RTI facility specially if matter is administrative. And here since I just want the case to be listed and heard by a learned judge. On further searches and analysis, I learned that all this is hppenign because some employees of computer department at high court (responsible for creating list of cases to be heard on a day) and 'Peshkar' or (Orderly whosoever) are being paid by opposite party just to keep the case from appearing in to the list. If any of you have come across with such situation and share your expereince, I would be thankful.