- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'local'.
Found 4 results
Sajib Nandi posted a topic in RTI in MediaThreats and assaults on Right to Information (RTI) activists have unfortunately become a common phenomenon across the country and one more incident has been added from Pune. On 31st March, Corporator Kailash Gaikwad, threatened RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar while he inspecting certain files under Section 4, at the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). The files Kumbhar was inspecting pertain to the politician’s construction site in upmarket Aundh area. Read more at: RTI activist threatened - Moneylife
akhilesh yadav posted a topic in RTI in MediaThe Punjab State Information Commission has sent a notice to the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the Principal Secretary, Local Government, Punjab, for not providing information under the Right to Information Act 2005 to Nakodar-based Gaurav Tandon directing the PIO to appear for the hearing with the facts of the case. Read at: Information Commission asks Local Bodies Dept to provide info under RTI Act
karira posted a topic in RTI in MediaNovartis takes RTI route, blocks local firm's bid to copy anti-diabetes drug AHMEDABAD:Swiss pharmaceutical giant Novartis has restrained a local pharma company from making anti-diabetes drug by approaching a court because the MNC had patented the drug and is enjoying monopoly over its production and sale. Interestingly, the Switzerland company used Right to Information Act to dig out which were the companies that intended to make such drug. By doing so, it prevented the production of its patented drug by any other company. Novartis AG filed a trademark suit last in the Mirzapur rural court against city-based West Coast Pharmaceutical Ltd demanding that the local firm should be restrained from making and selling Vildagliptin drug and its other formulations, which are successfully used to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus. Novartis submitted that it enjoyed patent of this drug in India since 1999 and to retain it till 2019. Hence, it has a monopoly over production of Vildagliptin and its two trademark products VALVUS that contains Vildagliptin as only active pharmaceutical ingredients and GALVUSMET, which comprises Vildagliptin and additional different ingredient - Metformin Hydrochloride. Novartis argued that it had taken several years to research and development of Vildagliptin at a huge financial investment running into hundreds and millions of US dollars and requiring substantial human resources. It also enjoys monopoly to its manufacture, sale and import in this country. It further submitted that it filed various applications under the RTI laws with the state's Drug Control Administration "in order to verify as to whether the other companies are intending to launch infringing pharmaceutical product containing Vildagliptin alone Vildagliptin + Morphin Hydrochloride". It came to know that West Coast pharma had applied for approval for manufacturing Vildagliptin 50, Vildagliptin + Morphin (50Mg/500Mg, 50Mg/850Mg, 50Mg/100Mg Tablets). Read More: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/search-panel-scrutinises-cvs-of-over-750-cic-ic-aspirants-115011600938_1.html
suman_ghosh123 posted a question in Ask for RTI SupportI am married with my wife on 2008 March. Wife had a conjugal life of hardly 3 months with me, sometime in my native and for 1 month with me, left matrimonial house in 2009. Although my native place is in Raiganj, i live in Kolkata. She and her parents use to abuse me althrough-out. My father expired on April'2012. Earlier father has filed general diary against my wife, her parents on 2010 with local police station and again reported the same on 2011 giving all the details that she does not live with me, not returned bacl and I stay far away from kolkata. Wife filed dVA and maintanance case against me on May'2012. Lower district court send notice to me along with my widow mother and my brother. during june'12. My widow mother accepted her but denied to take notice addressed to me and my brother as a reason that she is not in contact with her children. I have not received/accepted court notice/summons till date although a letter basis court ex-parte judgement on monthly maintanance of 20K and arranging her to stay in my native house was shared to me via protection officer on July 2013. I handed the same to local lawyer. Now court has ordered warrant against me whose executing order is still pending. My wife with help of protection officer brought police along with protection officer, broke lock and keys of my native home last week where nobody stayed. Wife started living along with her mother regularly. Local lawyers told me that there is nothing to worry as because summons/notice were not sent to me through proper channels. Pasting in my residential place, court did not accept the same. No publication in newspaper as well. Although a court record exists that they have sent the same to my kolkata adrress. But I did not acknowldege the same at any stage nor did I recieve. Local Lawyer has done a RTI to get top of it as how the summons were served Particulars of Information to be sought are:- a) To which address the summary of Mr. Suman Ghosh S/O Late Suprabhat Ghosh the O.P No 1 of case no CR 292/2012 of Ld Addl J.M was sent by the protection officer? b) By which process the summons were sent? c) Whether any summon/notice was sent to the address of working place of the O.P No1 Mr. Suman Ghosh of case no C.R.292/12 by the protection officer before 18-12-2012? If so by what mode? d) Whether any summon or notice of case no C.R 292/12 was served upon O.P Suman Ghosh S/O Late Suprabhat Ghosh personally? e) Was there any impediment/objection to serve the summon on him personally? If so what was the reason? Kindly let me know what may be the outcome and how many days does it take to get informations on RTI. I shall be waiting for expert input on the same. Regards Suman