- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'research papers'.
Found 3 results
[h=1]Research paper is not personal information: CIC[/h] New Delhi: The thesis submitted by a research student is not a personal or third party information and cannot be withheld by an Institution under the Right to Information Act, the Central Information Commission has said. Information Commissioner Sridhar Acharyulu said,"It is not third party information. Moreover, there is a public interest in knowing the originality of the thesis, especially when a serious allegation of appropriating the research work is made by the co-researcher, it is the duty of the academic institution to clear the allegation after due verification." The matter related to an RTI applicant who had demanded from Rajasthan-based Arid Forest Research Institute the copy of pre-thesis submission seminar details of a researcher, copy of her thesis, all correspondence related to research work, rules and regulation of research work and related records. The applicant alleged that the researcher had stolen theme of her research paper, hence she requires all these details to establish her claims. Acharyulu said the thesis submitted to a University is not private or personal information of the candidate who submitted it, but the property of the University, which has to discuss and decide whether it deserves the award of Ph.D or not. Read More: Research paper is not personal information: CIC | Zee News
As reported by Kiran Vadhwa at hindustantimes.com on November 15, 2010 Opposition to the appointment of Rajan Welukar as vice-chancellor of Mumbai University refuses to die down, with a section of the academic fraternity now citing information obtained through an RTI query to question the quality of the research work cited by him while applying for the post. The curriculum vitae (CV) of Welukar and others short-listed for the post by the search committee, have been obtained through an RTI application filed by a Delhi-based activist. The academicians, who spoke on condition of anonymity, claimed that Welukar, who has listed around 12 research publications in the CV, has included two that were yet to be published at the time and a third that he was still working on. The academicians have also alleged that four more research publications cited by Welukar cannot be considered publications. A copy of Welukar’s CV is with the Hindustan Times. Despite repeated attempts, Welukar was unavailable for comment. Welukar’s appointment has already been challenged in court. Public Interest Litigations by different individuals have stated that Welukar does not have the requisite experience to be appointed as Vice-Chancellor and that his appointment was in “violation” of University Grants Commission guidelines. According to the new regulations drawn up by the state in 2009, a Vice-Chancellor must have a minimum of five research publications in peer-reviewed/referred international research journals after getting a PhD. The academicians alleged that Welukar had barely managed to fulfill this criterion. “When you compare his [Welukar’s] CV with those of other candidates, the quality and quantity of his [Welukar’s] publications are far below. Also, if regulations say that a candidate should list only research publications, why has he listed problems submitted by him to journals as well as yet-to-be published works,” an academician asked. Replying to a query posed by an academician, Brigitte Servatius, the editor-in-chief of the Pi Mu-Epsilon Journal, which Welukar has listed in his CV, said that Welukar had only posed a problem in the journal. “Problems are edited by the problems’ editor, who will do a peer review, but publishing a problem is by nature not equivalent to publishing a paper,” Servatius said.