- NPAs under PM Modi's Mudra scheme jumped 126% in FY19
- shows RTI
- RTI query reveals banking frauds of ₹ 2.05 Trillion reported in the last 11 years
- 509 per cent rise in cases under child labour law: Study
- The Central Information Commission has allowed disclosure of file notings on the mercy petition of a rape and murder convict, rejecting the government's contention that the records cannot be disclosed as these are privileged documents under Article 74(2) of the Constitution.
- Electoral bonds worth over ₹5,800 crore were bought by donors to fund political parties between March 1, 2018 and May 10, 2019, a Right to Information reply has said.
- Don't pay 500/- for answer sheet now- Supreme Court says if Answer sheet is asked under RTI, RTI Fees will be governed
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'rti guidelines'.
Found 7 results
rtiindia posted a post in DoPTDepartment of Personnel and Training , Director IR has invited views/suggestions from the citizens on the draft guidelines regarding elements that a RTI reply should essentially contain by 16.04.2015. through email at firstname.lastname@example.org. You can visit our forum here and post your views/suggestion for improvement. The draft format has been vetted by Ministry of Law and Justice and contains following elements: The name, designation, official telephone number and email ID of the CPIO In case the information requested for is denied, detailed reasons for denial quoting the relevant sections of the RTI Act should be clearly mentioned. In case the information pertains to other public authority and the application is transferred under section 6 (3) of the RTI Act, details of the public authority to whom the application is transferred should be given. In the concluding para of the reply, it should be clearly mentioned that the First Appeal, if any, against the reply of the CPIO may be made to the First Appellate Authority within 30 days of receipts of reply of CPIO. The name, designation, address, official telephone number and e-mail ID of the First Appellate Authority should also be clearly mentioned. In addition, wherever the applicant has requested for 'certified copies' of the documents or records, the CPIO should endorse on the document "True copy of the document/record". sign the document with date, above a seal containing name of the officer, CPIO (in place of designation) and name of public authority. Standard format of RTI reply What are your views. Will this help in getting better reply? Kindly post it over our forum here, and we will forward them to DoPT. Download the Standard format of RTI reply circulated by DoPT.
[caption id=attachment_78" align="alignright" width="198] What are the time limits under RTI Act 2005?[/caption] Though the RTI Act has prescribed the time limits for various activities under which the action has to be performed, it is often found that most of the RTI Applicants are not clear about the time limits. We have tried to compile such time limits from within the RTI Act 2005 and tabulate it into one document. So What are the time limits under RTI Act 2005? Right to Information Act 2005 has prescribed time limits for various activities under which you shall get the reply from Public Authorities, the time for Decision of PIO in RTI Application, Transferring RTI Application toanother Public Authority, time to be taken for Decision by PIO on Applicationsconcerning Life & Liberty, time for Deemed refusal by PIO , time for Physical supply of information onremitting document charges(period between dispatch ofPIO’s decision and receipt ofdocument charges/fee to beexcluded to calculate time limit), time under which applicant is entitled to informationFREE of CHARGE/FEE ifinformation is not provided withintime limit, time for which Disclosure of information is exempted under Sec-8 [subject toClause (a), © (i) of Sub-Sec-(1)], time for which the Notice to third Party is to be issued, time for supply of information in ThirdParty cases, time for Decision by Departmental/FirstAppellate Authority (FAA), time for Supply of information relating tohuman right violations orallegations of corruption withrespect to security organizationsof Union Government included inSECOND SCHEDULE, withapproval of CIC e.t.c. This is the compendium of such information which we hope shall answer What are the time limits under RTI Act 2005 and be of immense utility for all RTI INDIA members as a handy tool. Please like it and circulate it to your friends. The link to the document is: time_schedules_under_RTI. The document can also be downloaded from our Download segment here!
rtiindia posted a post in RTI Act 2005[caption id=attachment_164" align="alignright" width="203] Public Interest and Private Interest under RTI Act[/caption] Frequently under Right to Information Act 2005, Public Authorities have been exempting information in narrower interpretation of the term Public Interest within the RTI Act 2005. Itself the definition of Public Interest is vague and RTI Act 2005 amplifies by stating "Larger Public Interest". Refer Section 8 e and 8 j of RTI Act. According to one of the dictionary Public Interest is defined as : "Welfare of the general public (in contrast to the selfish interest of a person, group, or firm) in which the whole society has a stake and which warrants recognition, promotion, and protection by the government and its agencies." Despite the vagueness of the term, public interest is claimed generally by governments in matters of state secrecy and confidentiality. Thus it is approximated by comparing expected gains and potential costs or losses associated with a decision, policy,program, or project and is fairly left for the discretion of Public Authority to interpret "..is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information." RTI Act Section 8 j Does it mean that Public Interest is the sum of individual interests? Is the public interest, then, that what is sought by the majority? Should the perspective used in defining the public interest be purely numerical? Can the term “public interest” include the protection of certain “higher” objective values? Can those values then be protected even against the will of the majority? If so, who should define and protect the public interest in a democratic form of government? In a democracy, policy decisions are formed based on the principle of majority, i.e. by voting procedure. A majority decision (e.g. a law or constitutional law) is a sum of individual interests, or the result of compromises reconciling individual interests; the main mediators of these interests are political parties. Is a majority interest also a public interest? - Taken from the Research Paper here! However, the fact of the matter is that.. RTI Act does not draw a distinction between demand for information in public interest and private interest. In one of the appeal hearing to Central Information Commission (CIC), the respondent’s counsel has tenaciously argued that the appellant’s request for information is not in public interest and that he is seeking this information for extraneous considerations. The question was whether information is disclosable under the RTI Act only in public interest and not otherwise. The CIC has decided as follows: "The Act provides for disclosure of information to the citizens of India subject to the provisions of section 8, 9, 10 & 11 of the RTI Act. In other words, appellant is not required to establish any larger public interest in his search for all classes of information. He is required to establish public interest only in particular clauses of section 8(1) of the RTI Act. In view of the above, we hold that appellant need not establish public interest while seeking information for all classes of information." -The decision details are available for download from our main website here!
rtiindia posted a post in RTI Act 2005[caption id=attachment_131" align="alignright" width="300] Right to Information Application form- can you ask why?[/caption] In Right to Information Application form, Information is being denied by Government under RTI Act because the applicant has asked reasons. Application asking why what is generally refused by Public authority. Therefore, it has been advised that an applicant refrain from drafting RTI Application having why and What under RTI. For example a query under RTI such has Why was the decision taken to cancel the tender? The above question shall be refused by the Public Authority resorting to provision of RTI Act that such information cannot be provided. Therefore, it has been advised by most of the activist and guides that the query be framed like this: Please provide me the documents on which the decision was taken to cancel the tender. However, it is very clear from the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005, that information held by the Public Authority in material form has to be provided to the information seeker, unless such information is denied under one of the exemption provisions of the RTI Act. Section 2 of the RTI Act defines the form of the information that can be accessed by citizen of India. Simply because the Right to Information Application form has prefixed query with why and what does not debar him for receiving information if that is a part of the record held by the Public Authority. Therefore in the above example, if the reasons as to why the tender was cancelled has been recorded in the file or is held in any form by the Government, it shall be provided under the Right to Information Act 2005. This stand has been substantiated by CIC in one of the decision where the information was denied as the respondent nature of queries of RTI application were in the nature of queries prefixing why and what and was not replied to stating that since such queries do not come within the ambit of section 2(f) of the RTI Act, the information cannot be provided. Right to Information Application form- CIC stand on 'Why' and 'What'! The commission has stated in the above hearing that "Simply because the appellant has prefixed his query with why and what does not debar him for receiving information, which is admittedly a part of the record held by the respondent. The Commission therefore directs the CPIO to provide the action taken on appellant’s RTI application for issue of non-official photo pass as well as the reasons for rejection of application, as per record. " The decision can be downloaded from here!
rtiindia posted a post in RTI Act 2005[caption id=attachment_137" align="alignright" width="300] Access to Information from other Ministry[/caption] Access to Information from one Government organisation is a simple step process. But can you access information of one Ministry from another? The Answer is 'Yes'. Government Ministries frequently refer the matter to other Ministries either for specialised inputs or for seeking approvals. Other times it is mandatory for a Government Department/ Ministry to forward the file to other Ministry. For example a file meant to creation of Posts is referred to DoPT and Ministry of Finance for seeking inputs and then for approvals. Similarly an Expenditure Finance Commission (EFC) proposal is sent to various ministries for consultation before it is put up before the Cabinet for approval. In most of the cases the whole documents are forwarded to other Ministries and sometimes it is the self contained note. If the Single File System is followed, then invariably the whole file is sent. Whatever be the case, it is for sure that other Ministries keep the Internal file for the Inter-Ministerial consultation and / or create shadow file. In a regular Ministry, once a file is received, the receiving Ministry create an Internal file and bring most of the facts into it. Once it is approved, the decision to it is conveyed in the original file stating the decision and that it has been approved by the competent authority. Similarly, most of the contracts and issues involving legal vetting, the whole file is sent to Department of Legal Affairs (DLA) for opinion. Most of the time, the DLA keeps a shadow file and copy of the advise given. Therefore, all such cases where Inter-Ministerial consultation and referencing has been done, there are both Internal file corresponding to the main file and also a shadow file of the main file. In such cases the question arises, can one have access to information relating to other Ministry? There is a very informative post available on our discussion forum here regarding this subject. The decision of High Court has been produced in this reference there, which is quoted as below: The Court Decision on Access to Information The words "held by‟ or "under the control of‟ under Section 2(j) will include not only information under the legal control of the public authority but also all such information which is otherwise received or used or consciously retained by the public authority in the course of its functions and its official capacity. There are any numbers of examples where there is no legal obligation to provide information to public authorities, but where such information is provided, the same would be accessible under the Act. For example, registration of births, deaths, marriages, applications for election photo identity cards, ration cards, pan cards etc. Thus it is clear that indeed one can have access to information of one Ministry from other Ministry PIO. If you have the access to information by using this method, kindly share it with our community here!
rtiindia posted a post in RTI Act 2005[caption id=attachment_49" align="alignright" width="287] RTI Guidelines[/caption] This attached document detailing Guidelines for seeking information under RTI Act 2005 has been published by DoPT in the month of Nov 2007. The Right to Information Act has converted the prevailing culture of secrecy into a culture of openness and transparency in the working of the Government. It will go a long way in strengthening our democratic institution, empowering the public, removing corruption and greater involvement of citizen in the development of nation.This compilation explain the method of making application for seeking information from the public authorities under Central Government, the procedure for preparing appeals and the steps for filing complaint in the matter. The content of this document shall also apply to State Government too An informed citizenry will be better equipped to keep necessary vigil on the instruments of governance and make the government more accountable to the governed. The Act has created a practical regime through which the citizens of the country may have access to information under the control of public authorities. Information is any material in any form. It includes records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models data material held in any form. It also includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by the public authority under any law for the time being into force. This right includes inspection of work, document and records, taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records, taking certified samples of material held by the public authority or held under the control of the public authority. The content is uploaded into our main portal http://www.rtiindia.org Kindly download the document Guidelines for seeking information under RTI Act 2005 from here at rtiindia.org If you like information under RTI Act 2005 document here please ask your friends to use it.
Most of students are approaching to me for asking about drafting RTI and getting certified photocopies from RTU kota. I would like to tell you that on any cost RTU kota is not ready to provide photocopies of answersheet because the system of copy checking was wrost arroung the world. As I seen that most of answersheets was not checked ans RTU declared the result under the pressure of government. SO students who wants to fight against unfair exam system I want to suggest you some points.. 1. File RTI in very short and sweet wording in which you can demand the inspection of answersheet, Omr sheet, tabulation sheet and Data feeding sheet. You should also demand certified photocopies. 2. You can also ask about date of declaration of results, upcomming results declaration dates. 3. You can also ask the reason in delay of results, Inordinately late condution of exams, errors in your marks and marksheets. 4. When you get negative response from RTU kota you can immediate move to High court Jaipur . I am strongly suggest you to make prayer in high court order under the RTI act and provide photocopies and pending information as per the section 7(6) of RTI Act. Recently High court jaipur in bench of Justice ajay rastogi allowing inspection of answersheet as per the university rules and regulation which is completely against the students. You can also refer such important judgement as below in you RTI and you writ petition 1.Hon'ble supreme court- CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6554 Aditya bandopadyay vs. CBSE 2. Hon'ble High court jaipur - CWP 17260/2011 Abhishek Jain vs. RTU 3. Hon'ble Rajasthan Information comission judgement - Appeal no. 6532/2011 Abhishek Jain vs. Controller of Exam RTU 4. Hon'ble Rajasthan Information comission Judgement - Appeal no. 6101/2011 Abhishek Jain vs. Kulsachiv RTU 5. Hon'ble Rajasthan Infromarion comission judgement- Appeal no. 6531/2011 Shahnawaz khan vs. Controller of Exam RTU