Jump to content

CIC decision on my second appeal No.000104


koteswararaonerella
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am herewith attaching the CIC decision on file No.CIC/BS/A/2014/000104/6563 dated 15th december-2014 relating to my second appeal forwhich I have attended the hearing through vedio conferrence Hyderabad. This is for just information

CIC-2.jpg

CIC-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is seeking reasons for inordinate delay amounts to questioning public authority ?

Can not a citizen question the Authority for deliberate injustice done to him, particularly when delay also involves corruption angle ?

Then where is the place for accountability and transparency in PA functioning ?

(Forget about RTI for the present)

 

 

Date of RTI Application 21-07-13, PIO replied on 05-08-13 and clearance was given subsequent to RTI application and after reply on 12-8-13 and Shri NKR has not informed the status on date of hearing) Yes RTI Is not a solution but a route map and how some times it gives the remedy as shown in this case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have not correctly analysed the issue.I did not ask or questioned them for the delay BUT ASKED WHETHER THERE ARE ANY RULES TO WITHHOLD THE AMOUNT IF SO KINDLY PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER which was acceptd by the CIC also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CTFORGK

ANALYSIS OF ISSSUE

 

we hope P.A. will take firm note on observations of decision hon. Shiv Prasad Ji vs bsnl 2011 again reminded by hon. CIC on another appeal heard on 15 DEC 2014

 

AND WE ALL SHOULD ONLY HOPE , AT LEAST AFTER THIS REPEATED REMINDER they will handle with care .

 

As now also one can't qns actions of p.a. even after dual appeals = reminders , even after implementation of rti act with letter and spirit. Its sad .

 

then how we will achieve good governance even after implementation of act with letter & spirit.

May be honourables know .

 

 

with regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

INTERROGATORY IN NATURE or QUESTIONING PA etc., should not appear so in the application.If you askWHY THIS WAS NOT DISPOSED SO FAR rthen it is a quesioning,on the other hand if you ask are there any rules or justification for prolonged NON DISPOSALthen it NOT QUESTIONING.The PA can say yes or No for this if yes he should enclose a copy of the order bdue to which there was delay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CTFORGK
interrogatory in nature or questioning pa etc., should not appear so in the application.if you askwhy this was not disposed so far rthen it is a quesioning,on the other hand if you ask are there any rules or justification for prolonged non disposalthen it not questioning.the pa can say yes or no for this if yes he should enclose a copy of the order bdue to which there was delay.

 

CAN REASONS FOR DELAY IN PAYING AND/OR ACTIONS OF P.A. ARE QUESTIONABLE

Or did they gave any answer or was provided BY ORDER ?

 

Rti act is for getting EXISTING information.

 

Pending g.r. bill is for ACCOUNTABILITY WHICH WILL LEAD TO FEW STEPS TOWARDS GOOD GOVERNENCE IF G.R. BILL IS IMPLEMENTED WITH LETTER & SPIRIT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119.9k
    • Total Posts
      428.6k
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy