Jump to content

New File- Information under Sec 4 - no need for PIO to provide or reject application

Recommended Posts

Prasad GLN

Judgment appears incomplete and not possible in a country like India, where there are several illiterate and RTI with specific Sec.4 disclosure is not known to all applicants or PIOs.

Hon.Judge can not over look stipulation in RTI that PIO must either to provide or deny information.

A simple copy and paste reply that information is available in Public Domain and giving a link should have been more appropriate by any PIOs and PIO ought to have provided the printed letter to applicants whose information is linked to such disclosures without taking any trouble atleast for accepting Rs.10/RTI fee. But giving a free hand that PIO need not reject or respond appears merciless and unkind to less educated citizens who are not having access to systems and internet.

But Hon.Judge is always right.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators

How many public authorities update information u/s 4.1.b regularly is also a question, in addition to how many citizens have internet access or how many public authorities have their websites or how many websites are in Hindi. where proactive disclosure can be uploaded in Hindi too. Many problems on the ground. This judgement needs to be challenged.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

There are 3 DOPT directives and several CIC decisions to Public Authorities to upload RTI Applications, PIO response, First Appeals and Appellate Orders. But several Public Authorities still have not uploaded the same.

The idea behind such directive is really laudable, as PIO can not at the time of hearing claim that they have provided information, as though applicant has preferred complaints, even after receiving such information.

Hon.ICs seldom pay attention to specific complaint that Public Authorities are not uploading the RTI information. In one case PIO has argued that the information was uploaded and Hon IC dismissed the case. When another RTI Application was filed, CPIO simply replied that he has provided correct information to IC that they were uploaded but it is accessible only to their officials alone and not to General Public. CPIO is correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is nothing but denying the right to information, in one way or the other. After studying the judgement, next course to file an appeal.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Any Hon.Members have come across any stipulations in RTI Act either for rejection or for keeping quiet on receiving RTI Applications ?

The issue is when the law is silent, can a Court interpret that part on which court is silent ?

What happened to several so called cash rich organisations with lot of experts craving for Publicity ?

Can not they take active interest, when the matter touches a common man who has no approach either to a Court or even systems or such internet associations or guiding activists ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy