Jump to content

Rejection of RTI applications by PMO office


MANOJ B. PATEL

Recommended Posts

MANOJ B. PATEL

The Prime Minister's Office is among the top public authorities to have rejected the maximum number of RTI applications received by them during 2013-14, according to an annual CIC report released on Wednesday.

 

The top slot in the list is taken by Ministry of Corporate Affairs which has rejected 28.85 per cent RTI applications received during 2013-14 followed by the PMO (20.49 per cent) and Ministry of Finance (19.16 per cent). Following them closely are ministries of Power and Home, Cabinet Secretariat, ministries of Personnel and Defence, President's Secretariat, Ministries of Housing and Petroleum and Natural Gas.

 

The data for 2013-14 shows slight change as for the previous three years, Finance Ministry topped the list of public authorities rejecting highest number of RTI applications received by it. Another trend mentioned by the transparency watchdog in its report is that the public authorities are rejecting the RTI applications citing reasons which are other than those listed out in the RTI Act.

 

An RTI application can only be rejected under categories listed out in sections 8, 9, 11, and 24 of the RTI Act which gives various provisions under which information can be denied to an applicant.

 

The analysis by the CIC shows a whopping 44 per cent of RTI applications being rejected by the public authorities in 2013-14 citing reasons as "others" and not giving any of the reasons in the RTI Act for rejecting the requests for information.

 

"This calls for scrutiny and introspection by public authorities to ascertain the reason(s) for rejecting requests for information on the ground instead of judiciously applying provisions of Section 8(1), 9, 11 and 24 of the RTI Act," the report says.

Link to post
Share on other sites
GirijaSiva

Very interesting statistics.

 

From the article is this derivation correct : 'Information is made available to the applicant not at first appeal stage but after order is passed by CIC.'???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Super Moderator
karira
Very interesting statistics.

 

From the article is this derivation correct : 'Information is made available to the applicant not at first appeal stage but after order is passed by CIC.'???

 

If the matter is "sensitive", applicant will not get information even after the order of CIC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Super Moderator
karira

Members,

 

Please DO NOT believe these figures.

 

They are provided by the public authorities themselves and have not been verified by the CIC.

 

Most of the figures given are figments of peoples imagination.....as I found out and proved to the APSIC. The answer was, "What can we do ? We depend on the PA to provide this information which is incorporated in our report".

Link to post
Share on other sites
koteswararaonerella

what APSIC told is the basic truth and the report published by the CIC mentioned in Manoj posts are also the figures supplied by the CPIO's the irony is that ministries dealing with corporate , spectrum , coal, etc will never give you the true picture since it is full of scam.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    • CB.
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,652
    • Total Posts
      427,775
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy