Jump to content

Security firm in residential quarter, public interest.


MANOJ B. PATEL

Recommended Posts

MANOJ B. PATEL

Appellant had sought copy of rent agreement, NOC etc. submitted by Major Tara Chand showing that he is retired. PIO denied under section 8(1)(e) as fiduciary relationship. Commission said: There is possibility of security firm running from residential quarter, it is in public interest. Directed the PIO to provide copy of rent agreement of the office of security agency.

CIC_SA_A_2015_000331_M_157385.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Come on Hon Manoj. I am talking of a specific IC, when hearing notices of other ICs are not being received even after 2 years. By the time they construct new office, probably no IC remains in his post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
koteswararaonerella

this is really a good sign as we are waiting minimum one and half year for our second appeal to come for hearing .appears to be improved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    • Sunil Ahya
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,609
    • Total Posts
      427,651
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy