Prasad GLN Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 It was informed earlier that CIC has discontinued seeking proof of ID for appeals. Even as on to-day, appeals diarized are being returned now with same reason. Any reference of CIC orders discontinuing the practice ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GirijaSiva Posted February 15, 2017 Share Posted February 15, 2017 You can refer to CIC/WB/C/2010/000177/SM dated 5 January 2012 with PIO being CPIO, High Court Madras, Chennai. "It was not right on the part of the CPIO to insist on the information seeker visiting her office to identify his signature and to prove his identity. This is certainly not a requirement under the law." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted February 16, 2017 Author Share Posted February 16, 2017 Sir, This is from CIC itself, returning of appeals not by CPIO insisting applicants. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shubhamkhatri Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Sir It will be benificial for us if you upload a document letter/notice of CIC regarding above 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 Mr.Khatri, please do make a call and inquire with CIC as I have also learnt when it was referred to me by appellant, and I have seen the letter myself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shubhamkhatri Posted February 24, 2017 Share Posted February 24, 2017 Yes I have inquired it by cic I have also requested them to send me its copy by email if they send me than i will upload it here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted February 24, 2017 Author Share Posted February 24, 2017 The issue is As to whether CIC is still insisting such identity of appellants for admitting appeals or not ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girish Agrawal Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Sir, The process of filing second appeal in CIC has now become online and there is requirement of uploading copy of identity proof for filing appeal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 The issue is still CIC returning such second appeals received in post for want of identity. The on line procedure was not introduced NOW but three years back and the teething problems were reported several times in the forum. In view of the same, experts advised members to prefer traditional mode of RTI correspondence through post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Girish Agrawal Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 even in 2015 the CIC has issued deficiency letter with the comment as per attachment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted February 26, 2017 Author Share Posted February 26, 2017 That was in the past, later some one reported in the forum, that this identity proof was withdrawn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koteswararaonerella Posted March 7, 2017 Share Posted March 7, 2017 the CIC second appeal format did not ask for any identity proof they only ask a copy of orginal RTI application, its reply by CPIO, first appeal copy and its reply and proof of dispatch but no where there is a separate provision regarding identity. if any doubt then I will upload the format. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 Members who visit once in a blue moon, interested in sharing their knowledge, for replying on closed queries, or answering a query raised 3 years back, should read the earlier replies and answer. When members posted copies of such 'Return memos" several times, then explaining the documents to be enclosed for second appeal appears not proper. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prasad GLN Posted January 28 Author Share Posted January 28 Recently, there was another reply from well known public authority that is having scant report to law and in specific RTI Act, the learned CPIO has demanded 1.As there is variation in signatures, please send attested signature from Magistrate.!!!! 2.Also send legal heir certificate from competent authority as stated in RTI Act !!!!! The matter was brought to the attention of Transparency officer and FAA several times which are in the rank of HEAD of SOUTH and applicant has not even received acknowledgment. The matter was reported to DOPT, DOPT informed that there is no such designation of "Transparency officer" and Hence duties and responsibles does not arise. For approaching HC, first there should be CIC decision and it takes minimum two hours at the present speed. God save RTI. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.