Jump to content
  • 0

in person presence is not desired due to my current academic interests




I asked one of the information from Public Authority. The concerned PIO provided partial information without giving reasons for the leftover information. I went in for First appeal to FAA. As I was away from hometown, meetings with FAA was not possible though I indicated in the first appeal itself that in person presence is not desired due to my current academic interests. My repeated pleas (almost 08 Nos.) to FAA to pass the order in-between yielded no relief. FAA passed the order after almost three (03) months of date of receipt of appeal. The order states that information can't be provided as it is third party information under section 8.


My query is - is FAA justified in passing such an order? Can FAA be penalized if I went ahead for second appeal?


Thanks and regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy