jps50 1,578 Posted July 3, 2017 Please refer attachment, being detailed decision dated 30-06-2017 of CIC on above subject. INVESTIGATION 81H 300617 IMP.pdf 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prasad GLN 1,597 Posted July 3, 2017 Yes. The decision is most authentic, and there can never be any better decision on Sec. 8 (1) (h). Hon IC can dispose the decision with single finding stating that it is his opinion. You see other ICs who are 'Divandhas" (sanskrit owl) that can not even see naked facts in broad day light and deliver decisions as they like without fear knowing that some will be deprived of their rights and what they do is not right. But here Hon IC discussed issues in 16 pages and delivered a speaking order. Just should also appear to have been done This is what IC SA can only do, and he deserves appreciation for such land mark decisions. Any Doubts that this is one of the best decisions of IC SA. If you rank CIC decisions in scale of 1 to 10, minimum 8 ranks are by IC SA for various decisions. Looking foward for getting a book with all his decisions compilation. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avinash_hyd007 10 Posted July 3, 2017 So the IC passed orders exempting Section 8 (1) (h), please clarify, I'm unable to understand Sent from my XT1562 using RTI INDIA mobile app 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prasad GLN 1,597 Posted July 3, 2017 To comment on his decision, it requires essay from a more competent person. In the decision discussion was on various on legal aspects as to when information can be denied on the basing of impeding investigation with specific justification how disclosing the information can impede the progress of such investigation. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
