Jump to content

Proposal of credit sanction to Hanung Toys and Textiles Ltd is under Larger Public Interest

Recommended Posts


The Bank has admitted that the loan has become an NPA and the company has not yet repaid the loan availed by it. In this matter a large amount of public fund has been advanced by the bank to M/s Hanung Toys & Textiles Ltd. The company has defaulted in repayment and the loan has become NPA, therefore, the matter is of larger public interest.


The Commission directed the respondent to provide certified copy of the proposal of credit sanction to M/s Hanung Toys and Textiles Ltd., after severing the personal information relating to the promoters, group or company as well as regarding the company's products,

technical know-how, etc., to the appellant.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

The appellant is a member of the forum. The decision appears peculiar to me for the following reasons.


1.In another petition filed by same appellant Hon. HD against Bank of Maharashtra, it was decided as follows:

The Commission agrees with the respondent’s submissions that since the matter

pertaining to the recovery is under process, any disclosure can adversely impact recovery of dues which would not be in public



Quoting this decision the above decision ruled that Certified copies of sanction letters must be provided to Appellant in larger public interest.


There is confusion in me as the first decision states there is no larger public interest and second decision states that there is larger public interest.

Even if it is presumed that CIC treated the first decision is not in larger public interest, as the matter is under investigation, in that decision, CIC must have considered the precedents relating to investigation must be how disclosing that information impede the progress of that investigation, instead IC felt that because the matter is under investigation, disclosure is not in larger public interest.


Only experts can analyze both the decisions for arriving at final point.

As of Now, this is a good decision, latest one, and any member can seek information from Public Sector Bank about sanctions made to borrowers, if the account has been classified as NPA.

There is variations in NPA also like Sub-standard, doubtful and loss assets, and Banks may provide information on loss assets (that part of NPA classified as such.

Moderators may preserve this judgment at appropriate CIC decisions in the forum.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

In another decision by Hon IC Bhargava, in Harinder Dhingra Vs. Oriental Bank of commerce, Hon IC upheld CPIO's contention that disclosing the names of Bank  officers in Vijaya Mallaya fugitive case may endanger the lives of such officials and hence can be denied.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission

      Decision No. 297/IC(A)/2006
      F. No. CIC/MA/A/2006/00663
      Dated, the 21st September, 2006

      Name of the Appellant : Shri S. Gangaiah Nayakar, 3/488, Rajapalayam Salai, T. N.C.Alangulam, District - Virudhunagar-626127
      Name of the Public Authority: Indian Overseas Bank, Customers Service Department, Central office, 763,Anna Salai, Channai-600 002. DECISION
      The appellant had sought certain information, which was largely furnished to him.
      The CPIO however denied the information relating to the details of loan accounts of another person and other documents submitted by him. The CPIO contented that the information sought is related to personal information, which is exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act. The appellate authority upheld the decision of the CPIO.
      There is no denial of information to the appellant. The Banks are expected to maintain confidentiality of the accounts of its customers and that the documents submitted by its customers do not fall under public domain. Hence, exempted u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act.
      The appeal is accordingly disposed of.
      (Prof M. M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner
      Download the decision from Download Segment

    • armyguy
      By armyguy
      This RTI is a powerful tool to expose major policy decisions. Recently a major breakthrough happened with effort in Delhi to privatize water supply in the city.
      Apparently, this was a proposed World Bank funded effort. The proposal was on since the mid nineties in complete secrecy. However, some news leaked out in to the press, and an RTI petition was filed asking for the files on this process.
      At first there was a lot of resistance, but finally the files were made public, and the story was shocking. Apparently, the World Bank was arm twisting and almost dictating policy to the government. The process of privatization (or any government work) takes place with bids by bidding companies. There is a two layered process, where first in this case the top six companies would be selected, and then in the second round, the best among them would be selected. Here, in the first round, Pricewaterhouse-Coopers, the well known consulting firm, had a bid that came in tenth. By law, they should have been eliminated. But the world bank insisted that PWC be considered. At first the government protested, but with continuous pressure relented, and declared PWC to be selected in the top six by declaring it to be an Indian company! In the next round, again PWC fared badly, with only a 67% score, and a terrible proposal. Again the world bank pressurized the government (by asking it to remove the people who evaluated the proposal), and forced the government to declare the PWC bid as the winner. Again, the government capitulated to pressure.
      It wasn’t just this, but the entire process of water privatization in this proposal was rather absurd, and would have affected millions of people adversely.
      Bowing to public pressure (after the dealings were revealed due to the RTI petition), the government scrapped the project completely.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy