sppataskar 28 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 On 9/11/2019 at 2:07 PM, nk agarwal said: Does the Section for delay in RTI Act-2005 speaks to prove malafide ? Yes,it is must. As per Section 20(1) of the Act, malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete information. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
koteswararaonerella 8 Posted December 1, 2019 Share Posted December 1, 2019 This comes in APPELLATE STAGE and not in ORIGIONAL STAGE 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Deepak Dang 9 Posted December 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted December 2, 2019 OTS accepted by bank for Rs.50000/= in 2003 but prooceds deposited in 2004 without closing the account. The applicant asked for “No dues Certificate”. It was refused. The Bank took the possession of Car under SARFAESI Act-2002 & sold it. The customer was not informed the facts. He considered that the car was stolen & filed claim with Insurance co. The Co. Finalized claim & deposited it to A/C holder’s account. Again the fact was not informed. A civil Suit was filed on wrong affidavit concealing the facts. It was also informed to court that documents demanded by A/C holder were destroyed as per policy. On this affidavit the case was dismissed. The applicant asked information/ documents of the account including account statement in 2012 which was provided in July 2019 at the stage of IInd appeal with CIC. The destruction of record & other facts pleaded by Bank were taken seriously by CIC & a show cause notice was issued alongwith penalty of Rs. 25000/= was imposed. The CPIO was advised to provide all the information within 10 days. Thus violation of provision was proved by inordinate delay & concealing information. The A/C holder/ Applicant received OTS without further payment. RTI IS A POWERFUL WEAPON. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Prasad GLN 1,786 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 I have yet to hear such gross negligence and irresponsible attitude of the bank and members will be thankful if a link of such CIC decision is provided. What about compensation for harassment and refund etc ? The bank should not be left like that for harassing a consumer . The final lesson is be prompt in repaying the loans and avoid highhandedness of the bank . Authorities view defaulters as criminals while deciding the cases. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.