Jump to content
  • 0

CCTV Maintenance First Appeal


subbu23

Question

 

RTI Application 1

Filed RTI seeking information on cctv footage at  4 police stations for a specific date and time 10 am to 11 am. Also enclosed copy of TNSIC judgement statng that police should maintain cctv data till the end of Second Appeal Hearing. I filed RTI within the 15 day time limit of CCTv storage. Most of the CCTV systems are not functioning properly at police stations.Henceforth I filed this RTI

 

PIO reply:  Applicant  did not  mention the exact time he visited the police station.Application lacks clarity.Moreover CCTV data preserved for 20 days only.Information Denied

Pls suggest Grounds of Appeal

 

RTI Application 2: RTI filed regarding maintenance of CCTV at police stations.  

Name of the technical concern that received report about malfunctioning of CCTV camera’s at   police stations, date of installation, the specific dates on which CCTV failed to function, the dates on which the repairs were made, and the days in which CCTV functioned properly ,copy of letter addressed to higher officials/Maintenance company complaining about malfunctioning of CCTV camera’s, copies of all letters made for follow up to keep the CCTVs functioning, circular/directive/order/notification that states about maintenance of CCTV cameras and trouble shooting exercises, follow up etc.Name of the contractor that installed such malfunctioning CCTV and the cost charged by him,provide copy of the bill/expenses disclosing the costs incurred for CCTV repair and present status.

Inspector of Police from Technical Wing of Police has replied as follows

1. For all your queries,  we would like to inform you that cctv are maintained as per the orders of head office.Further your queries are not raised in public interest, Information denied as per section 8(1) J, 8(1) h, 8(1) g

 

Edited by subbu23
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Prasad GLN

Mr.Subbu,

You are yourself an expert and need no guidance but reported only for giving opportunity to learn from your experience.

Please educate Second PIO that full CIC bench ruled that denying information that there is no larger public interest was never stated as exemption in Sec. 8 (1) of RTI Act.

You can also search in google or in our forum as there were many decisions by CIC for providing such CCTV footage.

Go for first appeal enclosing such decision.

 

In case of first RTI, seek laid down norm stating the process of deleting the data and entries required for deleting that footage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Shree Vathsan

In Most of the police stations in Chennai CCTV is not properly functioning. In some police stations only those Cameras which are pointed towards the entrance of the police station function. The one inside the police station where police illegally beat accused persons is purposefully switched off. 

Further I asked CCTV footage of particular station in RTI 2 days prior to receiving my application from 2 pm to 6 pm. However information has been denied stating that the information has been sought in a random manner and is  not specific. 

The station house officer is incharge of maintaining the CCTV footage and copy can be requested from him.

While few PIOs have denied information citing not  under 2(f) a few has come up with information sought  for the same RTI. 

Edited by Shree Vathsan
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

Please share that information given by few, so that Mr.Subbu can quote such information and demand for such information.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Sir,

PIO  is asking me to provide time of visit to police station. I did not visit police station for the requested time period in my application seeking CCTV footage. Police interefrenece in civil disputes, lock up death, sand mafia etc are reasons for police not repairing cctv cameras at stations

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

If the post is long and if full details are not posted, it become hard to decide.  The clear issue is as to whether you have quoted any dates.  If you have quoted dates, your presence is not needed.

CCTV cameras purpose is for larger public interest only and it is not internal administrative measure for police station.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Shree Vathsan

Could you please check the order No. I am unable to retrieve it from the TNSIC Website. TNSIC SA 637/A/2018 & TNSIC and SA 8543/A/2017

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Most Solved

    1. 1
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      3
    2. 2
      RTI RAJENDRAN
      RTI RAJENDRAN
      1
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      Sunil Ahya
      Sunil Ahya
      10
    2. 2
      RTI RAJENDRAN
      RTI RAJENDRAN
      7
    3. 3
      Prasad GLN
      Prasad GLN
      4
    4. 4
      subbu23
      subbu23
      2
    5. 5
      Priya De
      Priya De
      2
  • Our picks

    • Instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof
      Information Commissioner Divya Prakash Sinha held that seeking citizenship proof in case of demand of sensitive information is justified but seeking a signed copy of the application does not seem appropriate as the online portal does not mandate uploading of signatures.
       
      Sinha was hearing the plea of an Odisha-based RTI applicant who had sought from the Army information regarding implementation of rules under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 in all defence establishments.
      The Army did not provide any information to the applicant, the CIC noted. Akhand approached the Commission with a complaint that the central public information officer (CPIO) of the Army has demanded a signed copy of his online RTI application as well as identity proof before providing him the records.
      “In this regard, it may be noted that as far as CPIO’s request for citizenship proof is concerned, the same is not questioned as Commission in its prior decision(s) has held the view that Armed Forces stand on a slightly different footing as there may be instances that involve disclosure of sensitive information, and for such reasons it may be rationale for the CPIO to ask for citizenship proof,” Sinha noted.
      Originally posted here!
       
      • 1

        Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • Some of you -- at least CJ Karira, who helped me years ago in one crucial step, getting SEBI to acknowledge its own circular! -- know of a 15-year quest among desi academics to get SEBI to release its stale masked FII data for academic research. At one point years ago a parliamentary query by Shyam Benegal, then Rajya Sabha MP, sought the release of this data for academic research. He then made a subsequent RTI query asking what had done about his complaint about the terrible answer he got to his parliamentary question. We thought we had succeeded when in response to that SEBI did put in public domain that FII data and promised to update. And to  their credit, they did update it from time to time, even if a bit fitfully. But thanks to a question by a curious IIT-Madras undergrad, we realized that what SEBI gave with one hand they took away with another. While the idea was that the FII IDs would be masked to preserve privacy, without telling anyone, SEBI changed the masks each month, drastically reducing the value for academic research (since you can't even tell how many distinct FIIs are there in the data base, and whether anyone traded over time). It also caused mistakes in academic research since no one imagined that SEBI would use changing masks, when no other regulator or exchange on the planet does so.

      To get SEBI to finally agree to not hide by changing masks, but to keep a stable mask, has taken many years. But at least per the ruling received yesterday, it has been achieved, with no violence to anyone. I attach the ruling. I can also post the various submissions made at the Second Appeal hearing if there is any interest (need to scrub email-IDs, per the policy of this site).

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdfThis RTI site, in particular Karira-ji, has been very helpful to me in the course of this long episode thru countless RTI queries. And I am grateful for that from the bottom of my heart. I am confident we will see quite a few PhD dissertations using this database within the next few years.

      Addendum_To_CIC_2nd_appeal_28th_February_2020.pdf
      Second_Addendum_w_Appendices_29th_Feb_2020.pdf
      CIC-SEBIH-A-2017-139953-BJ.pdf
      Third_Addendum to Additional Submission for RTI Second Appeal_2nd_March_2020.pdf
      To_CIC_2nd_appeal_27th_February_2020_Redacted.pdf
      Draft_Talking_Points_for_the_Hearing.pdf
      From_SEBI_Written Submiissions - Murugappa Krishnan 139953.pdf
      thanking_CIC_post_decision_Redacted.pdf
      • 4

        Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy