Jump to content
RBCHAVAN

decision in 2nd appeal

Recommended Posts

RBCHAVAN

Sir, 

     In one case (2nd appeal)  I had asked regarding the status of the applications given for sub division of land.The SIC gave notice under section 18(3)(a) & (d) for 4 times to the PIO & FAA . Also the SIC asked why a fine of Rs.25000/- under section 20(1)should not be imposed in every notice for their non attendance and not furnishing the information. Inspite of the 4 notices the PIO & the FAA never turned up for the hearing.In one notice prior to the decision date the SIC had informed me (by ordinary post )to appear for the hearing.As I did not appear the SIC dismissed my appeal saying that the appellant had no  interest  in receiving the information as I had not replied to the notice regarding the information received or not  nor appeared  before the SIC. Also no fine was imposed on the PIO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Being a regular member, you are aware as to the opinion of several experts that appellants should evince keen interest to bring a logical end to an issue and attendance to personal hearing is most essential to get a favourable decision.  Either you can approach the HC or write a grievance to IC clarifying your stand for reopening the case. as no decision was delivered after personal hearing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
koteswararaonerella

AS many SICs are manned by only chosen people of government they will not pass orders against government in 2nd appeal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sppataskar

Sorry to say , no justice is expected from the State/Central Information Commissioners in Second Appeals. Neither no replies by the PIOs  to the Notices issued by the Commission nor compliance of the orders of the Commission..Seldom, the Commission will imposed fines.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prasad GLN

Irrespective of final outcome and without expectations, appellants as per law has to approach commissions.  If appellants are fortunate, the decisions may be in their favour.  Our Mahaguru many times stated that the chanting of Ram Naam Satya hai started even in 2009 and RTI is on ventilator.  One can expect better decision on  his individual luck.

You might have observed the quantity and quality of queries during last two years in the Forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RBCHAVAN

Hope future decisions are given as per law.. Prasad Sir I am confused who this Mahaguru is .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy