Jump to content
  • 0

Information sought about a Government Servant who is facing Vigilance Enquiry-Information refused by the PIO-reg


Venkatrajagopal

Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Prasad GLN

Except for going to second appeal at present there is no other alternate for the present as the Apex court has decided that the relations between employer and employee are in between them and there is no larger public interest involved.

However, the efforts to press larger public interest in case of corruption and malpractices should continue, as there are no exemptions under RTI for 'larger public interest' queries.  

Whenever the PIO reply is in other language, please use google translate and state the contents in English briefly so that other members can understand and respond.

The charge is more important.  If the charge is on corruption , fraud, breach of trust and malpractice PIO must provide that information and he is aware of that, and there is no harm to either employer and employee as the charge becomes public if an FIR is filed for recovery or case is filed for corruption by ACB.

Search in website of Police to download the FIR.  I do not find any justification in not providing answers to other queries and quoting their internal rules.  Once a FIR is registered, it is in public domain and not a third party information, and a citizen can seek information of employer name, designation and place of working and at any stretch of imagination by prudent person there is no invasion on privacy of such individual, and even if it is as such PIO must explore seeking comments by the third party and mark that reply as copy to Applicant.   Continue your efforts through first and second appeal.  TNSIC is more responsive when compared with some other puppet commissions.

Edited by Prasad GLN
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Venkatrajagopal

In this case the delinquent Officer has been arrested by the V and AC Department and the FIR is already in the Public Domain. The officer was charged by the V and AC for accumulation of wealth, disproportionate to the known source of income.

RAJASEKARAN-FIR.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Prasad GLN

Let us think practically, the delinquent was booked and case was referred to competent court after investigation and there was a logical conclusion without suppressing of facts or protecting the guilty, what more a normal citizen expect and in what way such other information is helpful further ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    • lights in dark
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119,720
    • Total Posts
      428,010
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy