Jump to content
  • 0

Bokha Srinivas


sstrust
 Share

Question

Kindly let me know the following details in regards to discussion between Agriculture ministry (GOI) and Samyukt Kisan Morcha (Farm unions) :

1. The total number of meetings/discussion held till date with them
2. The dates and the place the meeting held
3. The duration of the each meeting
4. The Points raised by the Samyukt Kisan Morcha(Farm unions) in each meeting
5. The Points accepted by Agriculture Ministry (GOI)
6. The Points rejected by Agriculture Ministry (GOI)
7. Please provide the complete breakup meeting wise communication/points discussed/date wise by Agriculture ministry and Samyukt Kisan Morcha

Hope you will do the needful

Thanks

Srinivas

THE AUTHORITIES HAS REFUSED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION BY INFORMING THE MATTER IS SUBJUDICE

kisanmeetingreplyjuly2021.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted (edited)

You can go for first appeal on the following grounds to FAA.

Grounds for Appeal: As per Sec. 7 (1) "reject the request for any of the reasons in Sec.8 and 9' alone.  Further CPIO is as per Apex court decisions should state such clause with justification for applying that exemption clause.  When there is no such exemption in Sec.8 or Sec.9, CPIO for his own reasons invented a clause "subjudice".  Even in several judgments/decisions this issue was clarified that when a Court specifically prohibits such information, then only it becomes justified.  Hence this first appeal for CPIOs unlawful and malafide rejection deliberately, after several clarifications. on this issue in 16 years of RTI Act.

Sec.8 (1) (b) sates: Information which has been expressly forbidden to published by any court of law or tribunal or disclose of which may constitute contempt of court.

CPIO has neither stated the reference in which any court expressly forbidden or justification as to how providing of information available in physical form as a record constitutes by contempt of court.  The word "subjudice" was not stated in Sec. 8 (1) (3) as interpreted by learned CPIO of a GOI Ministry.

 

PRAYER: Appellant prays for directions to CPIO for providing the information as expeditiously as possible free of cost and a special direction may be given to CPIO not to deny information by the exemption clauses invented by him and to deny information such exemptions as stated in Sec.8 (1) with justification and if possible with citations.  If the court has stated not to disclose any information on the subject, CPIO may enclose such court order copy.  CPIO may be provided with a reference book that explains the only sec 7 relevant to him or he may be sent to suitable training as such denials are a disgrace to GOI of Ministry, after 16 years RTI enactment.

Edited by Prasad GLN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      119.8k
    • Total Posts
      428.5k
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy