Jump to content

Over 300 DDA employees face corruption charges

Atul Patankar

Recommended Posts

Atul Patankar

As reported at indianexpress.com on Sept 16, 2009


New Delhi : High-ranking officials are among over 300 employees of Delhi Development Authority (DDA) who are facing anti-corruption cases, some of which are pending for more than two decades. Out of the total 305 cases, 167 were being investigated by its own Vigilance departments, 72 by Anti-Corruption Branch of Delhi Government and 66 were probed by the Central Bureau of Investigations. The corruption cases were pending against top officers like commissioner, directors, joint directors and deputy directors. Even the superintendent engineers and executive engineers were facing vigilance enquiries.

A total of 39 junior engineers, 11 assistant engineers, six executive engineers and three superintendent engineers among others are found to be allegedly involved in graft charges. Surprisingly, 18 senior officials from DDA retired without completing the pending probe against them.

The revelation came in response to an RTI filed by a social activist, Vivek Garg who sought details of pending corruption cases against DDA employees.

"It is surprising to know that despite several measures, authorities at DDA have failed to curb the menace of corruption," Garg said.

According to a senior official, the strength of Delhi Development Authority is about 22,000. Commissioner (Planning) Vijay Risbud, Directors V K Singhal and Jagdish Chander, Senior PS Ashok Kapoor, three Assistant Engineers Kapoil Deo, P S Rai, S C Verma and 15 junior engineers are among 66 officers against whom cases were registered by the CBI, the RTI reply said.

Whereas, cases were also pending against R C Jain and A K Sharma, both Superintendent Engineers, who have been superannuated from the DDA, it said. Out of the total 72 cases registered by the Anti-Corruption Branch of Delhi Government, four were against assistant engineers and seven were against junior engineers.

The cases were pending against Assistant Engineers S C Garg, Raghunandan, I S Panwar, Brijesh Kumar Garg and Junior Engineers Raj Kumar Malhotra, R C Jai, M S Anand, Kailash Chand Verma, Rajesh Kumar Baliyan, Sat Pal Dabas and Suresh Chand Solanki, the reply said.

The Vigilance Departmental cases were also pending against P M Parate, Director, Joint Director Shashi Kant, Deputy Directors K K Marwah and J B Malik, Executive Engineers S N Paul, S S Bhalla, A K Goel, Lalit Kumar, I J Gupta, Vijay Kumar and Assistant Engineers Shyamlal Singh and B P Badolait, the RTI response said.




Source: Over 300 DDA employees face corruption charges

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

i think to arrest corruption the implimention of restriction on maximum year a staff serve in senistive post must be implimented .


as below is CVC circular.



Dwarka Forum




Government of India


Central Vigilance Commission




Satarkta Bhawan, Block ‘A’,


GPO Complex, INA,


New Delhi – 110 023


Dated the 15


th April 1999



All Chief Vigilance Officers


Subject: Rotation of officials working in sensitive posts.




Instructions have been issued from time to time by the Central Vigilance


Commission and the Department of Personnel and Training for making rotational transfers in


respect of the officials posted on sensitive posts at periodic intervals. These instructions are


not being strictly followed and fallen into disuse.


2. In order to implement these instructions in a letter and spirit, it has been


decided by the Commission that a list of sensitive posts in various Departments/



should be identified by the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Department/Organisation. A list of


posts so identified by the CVOs may be intimated to the Commission immediately.


Thereafter CVOs in consultation with the Chief Executives would ensure that officials posted


on sensitive posts are rotated every two/three years to avoid developing vested interests. In


case officials posted on the sensitive posts continue to function in violation of the existing


orders, the Commission may be apprised so that it may take up the matter with the concerned


Departments/Organisations for implementing these instructions.





Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Tell a friend

    Love RTI INDIA- Online RTI? Tell a friend!
  • Members

    No members to show

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy