Jump to content
Atul Patankar

Application filed to oppose Medha Patkar's plea in Supreme Court

Recommended Posts

Atul Patankar

As reported at http://www.dnaindia.com on January 28, 2010


New Delhi: Narmada Bachao Andolan activist Medha Patkar's plea in the Supreme Court for transfer of a criminal defamation case outside Gujarat has been opposed by the complainant on the grounds that she allegedly suppressed various material facts and documents.


The application filed by complainant VK Saxena, president of Ahmedabad-based NGO National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), who has opposed her plea for transfer of the case to Delhi, sought the permission of the court to place evidence on record to substantiate his allegations.


He has sought to produce documents to prove that the main purpose of shifting the case to Delhi was to linger the proceedings on one or the other "false grounds" as has been done by her in other cases which were transfered from Gujarat.


The NBA leader has sought transfer of the case filed by Saxena in a Gujarat in 2006 for her allegedly defamatory remarks during a TV debate pertaining to Sardar Sarovar Project.


In the application, while opposing Patkar's plea, he gave reference of another defamation case which was transferred to Delhi on her plea by the Supreme Court in which she sought exemption from personal appearance by allegedly placing false medical certificate from a hospital in Nandurbar, Gujarat.


The NCCL president submitted that the information gathered by his NGO under the RTI Act from the Nandurbar Police clearly stated that when she sought exemption from appearance in the Patiala house court in New Delhi on March 3, 2009 on medical grounds, she had taken out procession on the NBA's demand to the office of the collector. Saxena had filed the complaint against Patkar on June 29, 2006 before metropolitan magistrate Gheekanta, Ahmedabad, accusing her of making a false statement that he received civil contracts related to the SSP in the name of NCCL.


The NBA activist has told the Supreme Court that she was seeking transfer of a criminal defamation case against her outside Gujarat as there was a threat to her life in the state from the members of the NGO.


Patkar, a Magsaysay award winner, has sought transfer of the case to Delhi, contending that the apex court had earlier shifted proceedings of another defamation case filed in Ahmedabad against her by Saxena. The case is pending before a metropolitan magistrate's court here.


She has alleged that Saxena's complaint was politically motivated as he was antagonistic to her ideology and her work. She claimed that he was instrumental in publishing many defamatory advertisements against her and NBA in various dailies for which she filed a defamation case in Delhi.


The activist submitted that instead of her, it was Saxena who had made several defamatory allegations against her and the NBA in the television programme in which both had participated over telephone.


Patkar and Saxena are locked in five criminal cases against each other. The NBA activist has registered three cases against Saxena.


Source: Application filed to oppose Medha Patkar's plea in Supreme Court - dnaindia.com

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Atul Patankar

HC notice to Patkar on plea seeking prosecution for perjury


The Delhi High Court has issued notice to Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) leader Medha Patkar on a petition seeking her prosecution for allegedly filing "fake" medical certificate to seek exemption from personal appearance in two criminal defamation cases.


Justice Siddharath Mridul asked the NBA leader to respond to the petition filed by V K Saxena, President of an NGO, National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), challenging the order of a trial court dismissing his application.


A trial court here had on March 31 dismissed the plea of Saxena who sought prosecution of Patkar for perjury for allegedly filing fake medical certificate to ensure exemption from personal appearance in defamation cases filed by them against each other.


The NCCL chief in his petition before the High Court, sought quashing of the metropolitan magistrate's order saying that the trial court had wrongly denied him adjournment as his counsel was not available on the day and it resulted in "gross injustice".


"The Magistrate has shown exemplary haste in disposing of application and even did not allow one-day adjournment to get the case argued through a senior counsel," he said.


The petitioner has also sought an inquiry into the matter to ascertain the truth about the medical certificate used by Patkar in the case.


"Respondent (Patkar) has deliberately, intentionally, dishonestly and with a view to mislead the court lied simultaneously in two cases to deliberately derail the due process of justice by filling false, fabricated certificate of her illness.


"However, the learned Magistrate failed to appreciate the efforts made by the petitioner (Saxena) to expose the lies of Patkar and instead of ordering an inquiry to ascertain the truth he dismissed the application, which has caused gross injustice," he said.


According to the petitioner, Patkar did not appear before a court March 3, 2009, and had sought exemption from personal appearance on the ground that she was ill by allegedly filing "fake" medical certificate which was issued by a hospital in Maharashtra.


Saxena, in his application, had questioned the veracity of the medical report claiming that on the day, she was busy staging a 'dharna' at the collector's office at Nandurbar in Maharashtra.


He claimed that according to a reply received from Public Information Officer of the Superintendent of Police office at Nandurbar in response to an RTI application clearly established that Patkar was medically fit and was present in the Collector's office on the day.


As reported by hindustantimes.com on May 27, 2010

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • karira
      By karira
      NDA may be in a tight spot over Najma
      New Delhi, August 02, 2007
      First Published: 18:51 IST(2/8/2007)
      Last Updated: 19:47 IST(2/8/2007)
      BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA), which had questioned President Pratibha Patil’s candidature by leveling various allegations against her relatives, may find itself in an embarrassing position in the vice-presidential poll due to an ongoing CBI inquiry against its candidate, Najma Heptullah.
      Heptullah, a former deputy chairperson of Rajya Sabha and a veteran MP, faces charges of having morphed a 1958 photograph to show her along with Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, in a publication of the Indian Council of Cultural Relations (ICCR). The issue was first highlighted by the Hindustan Times in April 2005.
      Responding to an RTI application recently filed by an employee leader of ICCR seeking the status of probe in the matter, the CBI has said, “preliminary inquiry was registered in CBI on the direction of hon’ble High Court of Delhi on July 5th 2006”.
      CBI sources say the preliminary inquiry has now been completed and the agency is likely to register an FIR in the matter soon, as prima facie it was a case of fraud.
      The court had directed the CBI to investigate the photo morphing case on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the ICCR Employees Association president SM Matloob last year.
      “We direct the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate the allegations and bring the same to a logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible”, the court said in its order.
      The controversial photograph was published in an ICCR publication titled, Journey of a legend, on the life of Maulana Azad, a noted scholar and the country’s first Education Minister.
      Azad was also the first chairperson of the ICCR and this publication came out when the council was headed by Heptullah, whose claim of being a close relative of the Maulana is disputed by the latter’s nephew, Firoz Ahmed Bakht.
      The photograph appears with an introduction and shows a young Heptullah seated along with the Maulana. The caption says ‘Najma Heptullah with Maulana Azad after her graduation’. This gave the game away.
      Official inquiries later revealed that Najma Heptullah graduated in May 1958, whereas the Maulana passed away on 22 February, 1958.
      The publication was later withdrawn by the ICCR and its revised version is now ready for release, but without the controversial photograph.
      Heptullah refused to react on the issue saying people can rake up controversies against anyone.
      “Whose life is without controversies! I would not respond to further questions as my party has asked me not to speak during the elections. I am fighting this election because I am the most suitable for the post”, she said.
      But photo morphing is not the only issue haunting the NDA’s vice-presidential candidate.
      Azad’s nephew, Firoz Ahmed Bakht has contested Heptullah’s claim of being the closest relative of the Maulana.
      “She tried to receive the Bharat Ratna in 1992 on Maulana’s behalf when my father, who was his elder brother was alive. Following my protest, the award was sent by post to my father in Kolkatta, as he was unwell and could not come to Delhi”, he said.
      Bakht has demanded action against Heptullah for misleading the nation on her claims of being Maulana’s closest alive relative.
      NDA may be in a tight spot over Najma- Hindustan Times
    • karira
      By karira
      ‘NCW, PMO misled by Noida police’
      Noida, December 27 Questioning the action taken by the Noida police to prevent the Nithari killings, the victims’ kin and activists working with them have alleged that officers of the Noida police misled the National Commission for Women and, subsequently, the Prime Minister’s Office was misled too. Commodore Lokesh Batra, an RTI and social activist who is planning to organise a meet at Jantar Mantar on December 29, said today, “We need to let the world know how officials from our governance system, who could have saved many lives if they had gone about their duties properly, have all gone scot-free.”
      In explanations given to the National Commission for Women (NCW) through an action taken report on six girls missing from Nithari village in 2005, the Noida police mentioned that teams were sent to various places like Muzaffarnagar, Faridabad and Gurgaon, among other cities in the state and elsewhere in the country.
      Police records, according to information received in a letter under a RTI application on January 4 earlier this year, say that no officer has ever claimed reimbursements after such visits. “It is amazing how officers of the (Noida) police kept paying for all the tours from their own pockets. They were either too concerned or no such search attempts were ever made,” Batra said.
      In a letter dated January 10, 2007, written by Inspector General of Meerut Zone Jagmohan Yadav to the Additional Director General of Police (Human Rights), Lucknow it is mentioned that a letter sent by a committee of the NCW looking into the case of the six missing girls on September 9, 2005 was never received at the office of the then Noida Senior Superintendent of Police Piyush Mordia.
      Interestingly, in a letter sent to the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Meerut Zone, dated December 12, 2005 Piyush Mordia himself mentions attaching a copy of the action taken report on a request sent through a letter dated September 9, 2005 along with the original letter. “Clearly, high ranking officers were trying to save each other when questioned by the NCW and even resorted to blatant lying and denial in the effort to do so,” Batra said.
      After the NCW committee reported that six girls were missing, DIG Meerut disputed their claim, saying the number of missing girls was five. Jhabbu Lal, who registered his case in 2005, said, “All six families had appeared before the NCW and submitted their complaints with copies of the FIRs.” In a letter sent to the Noida SSP by the then Additional SP Saumitra Yadav, dated September 9, 2005 Jhabbu Lal’s complaint that, “We suspect that the person responsible for children going missing is from the Nithari village”, was quoted. “If action had been taken instead of suppressing figures and cases, so many people might not have lost their children,” Batra said.
      While Payal (whose murder case is presently with the Special CBI court in Ghaziabad) had been missing since May 7, 2006 and even an FIR was not registered, in a letter written to the PMO in September 2006, Shailendra Pratap Singh, the then DIG Meerut Zone, said the Noida Police was taking all necessary actions.
      “Had the necessary action actually been taken, the reality would have been different today,” Batra said. According to information provided by the Noida Police in a reply to a RTI application on February 19 earlier this year, there was no chowki in-charge at the Nithari police post for three months, from February 20 to May 23 in 2005, around the time when the first missing case, of Rimpa haldhar, was reported, on February 10. Once again, an FIR was not registered. Also, on an average, no officer stayed there for more than two to three months.
      Batra said, “I have filed several applications under the RTI Act and this information proves the negligence of officers and lays open their attempt at cover-up after that.”
      ‘NCW, PMO misled by Noida police’

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy