Jump to content

500 villagers in TN invoke RTI Act on iron ore mine project

Recommended Posts


500 villagers in TN invoke RTI Act on iron ore mine project


As Reported in June 17, 2008 chennaionline.com


Salem (Tamil Nadu), June 17 Over 500 villagers from about 50 villages

in and around Kanjamalai, opposed to the proposed iron ore mining in

vast tracts of reserve forest land in their area, today resorted to a

novel protest by invoking the Right to Information Act asking the

Tamil Nadu government to come clean with details of the project.


The villagers from in and around Kanjamalai in the district caught the

officials by surprise by barging enmasse into the District Forest

office here to present their petitions under the RTI Act, seeking

details such as who gave the lease order and how such a project can be

permitted in reserve forest land.


The state-owned Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation and

SISCOL have formed a joint venture for taking up mining in about 630

acres in Kanjamalai and according to reports the State government was

awaiting clearance from Union environment and Forest Ministry and

Department of Mines.


The villagers contended that mining in the area would lead to

ecological problems and affect their livelihood, District Forest

Officer V P Kandaswamy told - Agencies

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • karira
      By karira
      Tamil Nadu may face action under Section 18(3) of RTI Act
      Tamil Nadu may face action under Section 18(3) of RTI Act
      The government claims that the information regarding land acquisition for SEZs cannot be shared as private parties involved in the projects are against it
      John Samuel Raja D
      Chennai: Tamil Nadu has failed to comply with two orders from the State Information Commission to provide information relating to land acquisition for special economic zones (SEZs), leading to demand by the applicant that the information commission seek documents from the government using its power under section 18(3) of the Right to Information Act. The section confers the power of a civil court to the Information Commission.
      “This is for the first time probably anywhere in India we are facing this (action under section 18 (3) of RTI Act) situation,” said S. Ramakrishnan, state chief information commissioner. “There is no fixed time frame for action under this section”. The matter will be heard next week.
      On the other hand, the state government claims that it has obtained a stay order from the Madras High Court on 26 October 2007 against operations of the state information commission order.
      Strangely, the government claims that the information cannot be shared as private parties involved in the projects are against it.
      A senior official in Industries Department who did not want to be identified, said, “We are unable to provide documents that are not of the department like project reports and memorandum of understanding (MoUs) as these have commercial significance and companies have said no to us sharing them.”
      Ramakrishnan, however, says that they have not received any information regarding stay order from the Madras High Court. The Industries department has complained that it was not given proper hearing before the commission, therefore the complaint would be heard next week and action under section 18 (3), taken subsequently.
      Madhumita Dutta, a volunteer at The Other Media who sought information from industries department from December last year, said she wants to share the details of land being acquired with the affected people, so that they can take informed decision about their. “At present, no information is available and people are being cheated”, she said.
      Her organization claims that, “the land requirement for 55 out of 66 approved SEZ proposals is about 32,235 acres, or 130 square kilometres roughly the size of Coimbatore (a tier II city in Tamil Nadu)”.
      In an earlier case too, the state had failed to provide details about the proposed Tata Titanium Project in the southern districts of Tamil Nadu.
      Tamil Nadu may face action under Section 18(3) of RTI Act - livemint
    • karira
      By karira
      As reported by PTI in hindu.com on 24 May 2008:
      The Hindu News Update Service
      'Large-scale smuggling of PDS rice from TN by DMK men'
      Chennai (PTI): Charging that there was a large-scale smuggling of PDS rice from Tamil Nadu by ruling DMK men, AIADMK chief Jayalalithaa on Saturday blamed Chief Minister M Karunanidhi for not taking any action against them.
      Alleging a nexus of police and DMK functionaries behind the smuggling, Jayalalithaa, in a statement, said due to this, ration card holders were deprived of their monthly quota of 20 kg of rice.
      "Rice supplied under the Rs two per kg scheme to ration shops is being smuggled by DMK partymen, with the help of police, to other states or sold in black market," she said. She claimed that 1.9 lakh quintal of rice was smuggled last year, citing information received under the Right to Information (RTI) act.
      The former Chief Minister said some persons were arrested for smuggling rice only after AIADMK and DMK's allies came out with concrete proof.
      "There have been complaints from people that they are being supplied only 20 kg of rice at the fair price shops while some other essential commodities are not supplied regularly," she said while calling for immediate solution to the problem.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy