Jump to content

Ankleshwar activist moves MP High Court against dumping of gas waste

Recommended Posts


Vadodara, May 7: FOLLOWING the proposed move to dump Bhopal Gas tragedy waste in Ankleshwar, an Ankleshwar-based activist Ziya Pathan filed an application in Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday.

Meanwhile, Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) member secretary Sanjeev Tyagi said that it was not confirmed yet whether the waste would land in Ankleshwar or not. “We are presently reviewing the situation, but we are in dark as to what is happening in Madhya Pradesh’’ said Tyagi.


Ziya Pathan made an intervention in writ petition No. 2802 of 2004 (Alok Pratap Singh v/s Union of India and Another) in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, expressing fears about the Bhopal Gas tragedy waste coming to Ankleshwar for incineration.



In his application to the court, he sought permission to make an intervention requesting it not to allow any further steps to be taken to shift the waste from Bhopal to Ankleshwar.


He also stated that Ankleshwar already stands identified as a critical polluted zone by the Central Pollution Control Board and as a ‘toxic hotspot’ by Gujarat.


He cited the observations of Supreme Court Monitoring Committee, which in their April 2004 report, had stated that groundwater of the area is so polluted that it is not fit to drink. It was following that report that an order was passed directing Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh Governments to supply fresh drinking water through tanks or pipes. Meanwhile, Tyagi said that the representation of environmental activists was being taken into consideration.


Incidentally, the GPCB response following protest is tad surprising, for it is GPCB only which gave the No Objection Certificate for the proposed incineration in Ankleshwar earlier.


A delegation comprising of activists from Vadodara, Ankleshwar and Suart, PUCL, Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti and Narmada Pradushan Nivaran Samiti has also met GPCB officials voicing their concerns. On Monday, Vadodara and Ankleshwar-based activists met GPCB officials, filing a RTI application seeking, details about the correspondence regarding waste transfer from the Union Carbide (now Dow Chemical) factory to Ankleshwar.

Activist files RTI application


VADODARA-BASED environment activist Rohit Prajapati on Monday filed a RTI Act application seeking details of all correspondence regarding transfer of waste from the Union Carbide (now Dow Chemical) factory to Ankleshwar for incineration. Prajapati, in his application, sought copies of all documents and correspondence regarding this matter, including correspondence between and/or documents issued by GPCB, Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board, Bharuch Enviro-Infrastructure Ltd, and the Government of India.


Ankleshwar activist moves MP High Court against dumping of gas waste

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • crusader
      By crusader
      I want to know that I have got information from Nagar nigam, Can I use it as an evidence in the court of law? What are the provisions related to that?
    • Shrawan
      By Shrawan
      Central Information Commission


      Decision No.292/IC(A)/2006
      F. No.CIC/MA/A/2006/00588


      Dated, the 21st September, 2006


      Name of the Appellant : Sh. Sharabh Dubey, 11/7 Civil Lines, Kanpur –208 001. (U.P.)
      Name of the Public Authority: The British India Corporation Limited, 14/136 Civil Lines, P.B. 77, Kanpur-208 001.
      Facts of the Case:

      The appellant is an employee of the respondent. He was transferred to another Unit of the company. The office order was challenged by him in the Court, which adjudicated on the matter. Subsequently, he has filed a few more petitions on service related matters in the Court. In this backdrop, he has sought documents relating to the legal opinion obtained by the respondent, file notings by the senior officials on the issue of transfer, letters/correspondence with other officials, etc.
      The CPIO has denied the information and sought exemption u/s 8(1)(d) & (g) of the Act.
      The case was heard on 12.9.06. The appellant could not be present. The CPIO and the appellate authority were present. In the course of hearing, the CPIO showed a copy of the petition filed by the appellant in the Court, whic hcontained almost all the documents asked for by him. The CPIO contended that the documents asked for by the appellant relate to the various petitions filed by him in the Court. He, therefore, pleaded that the disclosure of the documents might adversely affect the disputed cases. Hence, the relevant documents are treated as confidential.
      Commission’s Decision:

      There is a dispute between the appellant and the company on service matters, including transfer of the appellant to another unit. The matter is pending before the Court for adjudication. There is every possibility that the appellant would get opportunity for his effective defense. The information sought is in the interest of the seeker. And, as such, there is no overriding public interest, u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act, for disclosure of the information.
      The appeal is therefore dismissed.

      (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
      Information Commissioner

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy